Talk:NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts

This article is very one sided right now. There must be something to say about NIAC besides accusations of corruption.


 * It is equally one-sided now. All criticism of NIAC is gone now.  I think NPOV is warrented, because the soundness of NIAC projects is very much in question. DonPMitchell (talk) 16:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

niac rebirth
http://moonandback.com/2011/08/08/nasa-selects-visionary-advanced-technology-concepts-for-study/ curious to know wich are the russian, indian and chineese equivalent --Beaucouplusneutre (talk) 18:36, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

scathing criticism of NIAC as unscientific embezzlement / patronage scheme
may be found here http://nasa-niac.narod.ru/ although unfortunately it's mostly in Russian. But this article http://nasa-niac.narod.ru/p7.htm is in fairly readable English. 76.119.30.87 (talk) 07:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724233526/http://www.spaceelevator.com/docs/355Bogar.pdf to http://www.spaceelevator.com/docs/355Bogar.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)