Talk:NASA spin-off technologies

Requested move 27 August 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: CONSENSUS TO NOT MOVE. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:48, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

NASA spinoff technologies → List of NASA spin-off technologies – The article seems much more like a list than a typical article. Also, added a dash in "spin-off" per the typical dictionary spelling of the term. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 15:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose, the lede intro gives the history of the topic and then the items follow not as a list but as individual topics. A list would have shorter sections, even one sentence descriptors. Seems fine as is, and the "list" name could be a redirect. Randy Kryn (talk) 20:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose, this is not a list class article. I did make the list page into a redirect. --Frmorrison (talk) 18:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Fast Company article of 2022-01-24
For those familiar with the editing milieu surrounding this Wikipedia article, the following source might be useful:
 * Wikitext for cite:
 * Cheers. — RCraig09 (talk) 22:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Cheers. — RCraig09 (talk) 22:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Cheers. — RCraig09 (talk) 22:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)