Talk:NDA (song)

Hyperpop
Idk what your guys' interpretation is of what hyperpop sounds like but this isn't anywhere near hyperpop, it's just pure electropop. A distorted drum on a pop song doesn't make it automatically hyperpop, tag it electro industrial if you wanna be more apt lol 2601:204:CA02:D90:7D23:717D:D7FC:31DC (talk) 22:32, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

A reliable source like Vogue (in this case Teen Vogue) becomes unreliable when it says wrong info. Keep in mind this is the ONLY article that describes the song as hyperpop, out of the dozens that have already come out about the song. No other site is describing this song as having hyperpop characteristics. 2601:204:CA02:D90:C9E5:B0E9:C6C1:535A (talk) 05:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

As for WP:OR, do not use such facts or claims as true. You as a user is not a reliable source. Just because no other sources have come out yet and states that it is hyperpop doesn't mean it is untrue. Only one source calls it "alt-pop", should it also be removed? And Teen Vogue is a reliable source as per WP:RSP and characteristics of hyperpop varies. Swiftiekaghorl?13 (talk) 05:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Me as a user has ears, thanks tho! The song isn't even hyper (relating to tempo), nor does it have pitched up vocals, nor does it have eclectic distorted production. I say again, a distorted snare drum doesn't make a song hyperpop, and Teen Vogue and this site should know better. 2601:204:CA02:D90:C9E5:B0E9:C6C1:535A (talk) 06:28, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

So what happens when a reliable source provides unreliable information? Does this site just not care in that scenario? Would I have to find a quote from another reliable source talking about why Teen Vogue doesn’t decide what is and isn’t hyperpop? You must realize that “original research” is imbedded into most if not every article, because not every statement is sourced or needs one. 2601:204:CA02:D90:3C81:4709:32A6:EDA6 (talk) 20:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Fans’ critical reception
I saw that mAny fans of Billie on TikTok hated the song. Should I include that on the “critical reception” section? Just a thought. Tengoritmo (talk) 15:38, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No, you shouldn't. Critical reception is meant for just that – reception from music critics. Unless the fans are professional music critics who published a review through the publication of which they work for, you shouldn't add it in. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 19:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)