Talk:NEXA

Contested deletion
I am working on removing the may be promotional contents from the page. I would request time to improve this article and would seek help from users to help me doing this. --Edito Freak (talk) 08:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Removed Speedy Deletion Badge
Removed the Speedy Deletion badge. This article is based on concrete references, and I see that use has removed the promotional appearing contents. This article can be improved, not deleted. Speedy deletion was added without reading the references perhaps There To Do (talk) 08:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

I will improve
I will keep improving the article, thank you There To Do (talk for the help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edito Freak (talk • contribs) 08:51, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Where is the advertise now?
Please suggest me what points to work on? I have worked from my side to improve the article and managed to trim it. However, there are substantial references to the points those were written in the article, still I have removed them. Is there something more to do? Please help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edito Freak (talk • contribs) 09:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... I have removed the points that might seem promotional to someone. I want the person who marked this page for deletion to go through the article once again. --Edito Freak (talk) 09:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It reads like a press release. What is your connection to the subject of the article? John from Idegon (talk) 09:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

I do not think that it reads like a press release, and also, I do not think that you should have a connection with the subject itself to write an article! What is your point behind holding the thing? I do not see it anything like promotional now! Biharipride (talk) 10:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... John is attempting to prove me a TW, I am not sure from where he has made this verdict. I have been through the references and article. It's good to be there. Nevertheless, respecting the John's comment, I am not removing the speedy deletion badge from the article. I leave it to some respected editor, like John himself to do it. --There To Do (talk) 09:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion
Not an article to be deleted. I see the user has done good effort to euphemise the advertise tone. However, the references in the article are very much from independent sources! I do not think this article a right candidate for deletion! --Biharipride (talk) 10:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It is a clear candidate for deletion. It is just an advertisement. I came here in the hope of improving it, but this would be a waste of time. Maproom (talk) 10:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I think you are directly blaming that mainstream media is paid by these companies to display advertisements in the newspapers or tv shows! Biharipride (talk) 10:51, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Incorrect link to the older discontinued Baleno under Nexa
I apologize if this is not the right way to bring this to community notice. The link to "Baleno" leads to the old Baleno sedan. Maruti has reused the Baleno name in India for the under the Nexa umbrella for the current 2015 baleno hatchback, which you can see is a completely different car. I couldn't find a lot of authoritative info about the new balano's name outside india. I see the names Suzuki IK-2 and Suzuki YRA.

If insufficient information exists, the link should be deleted rather than point to an incorrect model. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.166.167.78 (talk) 15:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)