Talk:NHL Network (Canadian TV channel)

Separate article for US Version?
I know that the US launch is up in the air, but shouldn't the Canadian and US versions be separate articles? And if so, what should the names be? Should the Canadian version be listed as NHL Network (Canada) or just NHL Network? Or should NHL Network become a disambiguation page for the separate US and Canadian pages. I think they should be separate since one is a Canadian digital channel and the other is a (potential) US cable network with different ownership and management. Milchama 11:15, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * NHL Network (U.S.) has been created. Milchama 23:17, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It has been moved to NHL Network (United States). --myselfalso 22:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

New Logo
Is anyone able to find the new logo of NHLNetwork, I don't know when the new logo was added tot he network but it is visable from the web site but not in any way that u can post it on wikipedia. It would be good to add it to the article. 74.109.62.238 23:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It's done! 74.109.62.238 17:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Unsourced claim that the NHL announced closure
Can you please provide a WP:reliable source to WP:verify your claim that "the NHL did in fact announce it"? I can't find any announcement from the NHL. If it hasn't been announced, then we shouldn't be trying to predict the future. And if it has been announced, it certainly needs to be sourced.

Also, why do you say that mentioning the closure of the channel with the rest of the history is "awkward"? This content fits much more naturally with the intimately related discussion of TSN loosing the NHL rights (which is why it closed) and the NHL reconsidering the future of the channel. The way you've written it the reader has to read half an article to figure out what the end result of that reconsideration is. And why do you want an entire section dedicated to the single sentence on the closure? Policy (MOS:PARAGRAPHS) says "Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading". Why ignore the MOS? TDL (talk) 01:30, 3 June 2015 (UTC)