Talk:NOAA-B

B-class review
This article has come a long way in the last year, and is clearly no longer a stub. I've assessed it at C-class and to give some ideas on ways it can still be improved, I have had a quick look over it compared to the B-class criteria.
 * Referencing & citations: The article is well-referenced for its length. The reference format is rather unusual, I'm not sure whether this is a problem or not.
 * Coverage & accuracy: I think this is the main area for improvement, the current article is very focussed on the failure. Would it be possible to add some information on the spacecraft itself and the progress of the launch up to the failure.
 * Structure: Structure is fairly good, although would be useful to have sections on the spacecraft itself and the launch (aside from the failure).
 * Supporting materials: It would be nice to have a picture of the satellite in the infobox, and maybe a photo of the launch. Suitably-licensed images are usually available for most US weather satellites.

I hope this is useful for improving the article further, as a great job has been done so far. -- W.  D.   Graham  10:50, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NOAA-B. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140624105104/http://www.astronautix.com/craft/tirosn.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/craft/tirosn.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:36, 10 February 2018 (UTC)