Talk:NSB Class 71

NPOV violation?
"he Norwegian Federation of Organisations of Disabled People have criticised Flytoget for ordering identical cars that will not ease access for the disabled.[2] Combined with the plans to remove the staff from the trains, this would mean that disabled would not be able to take the trains.[3]"

While these comments appear to be properly cited, shouldn't there be some reason given for why allegedly inaccessible cars were purchased? The article needs a little bit of balance here, especially as it is so short. 66.234.220.195 (talk) 05:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The article cited is from 2004, Flytoget has no plans removing the staff from the trains currently. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.215.54.132 (talk) 15:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

GMB - what is the accronym?
GMB is an Accronym - what is the meaning of these three letters? Is it GarderMoBanen? The article Gardermoen Line does not use the letters GMB. Teeschmid (talk) 19:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

No cab signalling
Are these trains really running at 210 km/h without cab signalling? Relying on a driver to see a signal at speeds over 160 km/h is - to my knowledge - considered to be unsafe. I do not find anything more precise on signalling for high speeds in Norway; just a short mention that ATC is installed on GMB Class 71 and somewhere else that the Swedish ATC is compatlible with the Norwegian; but not with the Danish. Teeschmid (talk) 20:21, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Requested move 13 December 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: move to NSB Class 71. (non-admin closure)  XAM2175  (T) 21:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

GMB Class 71 → ? – proposal a) NSB Class 71, proposal b) Flytoget Class 71, both on the grounds of consistency with other articles and because "GMB" doesn't satisfy the policy against ambiguous abbreviations in article names. I prefer proposal (a), because the units were ordered by NSB and it's consistent with other articles on Norwegian locomotives and multiple units. Proposal (b) uses the current name of the operator, which was separated from NSB in 2001, and is thus closer to common use – but it's my less-preferred option because it could establish a precedent of renaming articles every time the operator changes. XAM2175 (T) 20:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC) — Relisting.  echidnaLives  -  talk  -  edits  02:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC)  — Relisting.  echidnaLives  -  talk  -  edits  03:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Relisting comment: Relisting to get consensus on place to move to. echidnaLives  -  talk  -  edits  02:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Relisting comment: Once again, no participation. echidnaLives  -  talk  -  edits  03:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Trains has been notified of this discussion. echidnaLives  -  talk  -  edits  03:11, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Norway has been notified of this discussion. echidnaLives  -  talk  -  edits  03:12, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support move to NSB Class 71, a redirect can be created from Flytoget Class 71. Mjroots (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)