Talk:NSB Class 73/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 06:51, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments and discussion
I've reviewed the article and it's almost ready to go &mdash; just the grammar points I noted as to criterion 1a in the table above. The copyedit will need to be addressed before I'd be willing to pass the article to GA status (a typo was fixed on the article just today, even), but that shouldn't take too long. I'm putting the nomination on hold pending the edits. You can notify me here or on my talk page when the article has been copyedited, or I will come back in a week to re-review. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 17:04, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I've done a copyedit, and found some issues. But unless you can be specific to where any additional issues lay, it is difficult for me to do much more. In my experience, a request at the Guild can take an eternity. The GA does not require perfect prose, and if neither of us can identify the specific issues, it is good enough for the criteria. Arsenikk (talk)  12:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the edit, it looks much better. As to criterion 1a, it does not require "perfect prose", but it does require that spelling and grammar be correct. At any rate, I do not see any obvious errors at this point, so it does appear the article meets all criteria. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 16:52, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Arsenikk (talk)  18:05, 27 August 2011 (UTC)