Talk:NSB El 18/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:29, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * ... and the cabs are pressure tight.  What does this mean?
 * Explained Arsenikk (talk)  21:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ... and that NSB could expect "a racket" Would "dispute" be a better word than "racket"?
 * It is a bit difficult to translate this. The term "skikkelig bråk" could be translated to "dispute", but it implies much more than that; these are rather angry unionists who were a bit pissed off. Dispute seems a bit soft, but then again it may be more accurate than racket. Anyhow, there seems to be no optimal translation here. I'll change it though. Arsenikk (talk)  21:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the fixes. Dispute is a better word in English. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References appear to check out.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Sufficient detail without trivia.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Licensed, captioned and tagged.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the very fast review. Arsenikk (talk)  21:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a pleasure, I am now happy to pass this. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the very fast review. Arsenikk (talk)  21:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a pleasure, I am now happy to pass this. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a pleasure, I am now happy to pass this. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)