Talk:N class destroyer

[Merging
There is no reason to have this page separate from J and K class destroyer. The differences between the 3 flotillas are negligible, and they are treated as 1 class by authoratative works; Either all flotillas should be treated as a single class (e.g. J, K and N class) or all three should be treated as 1 class. The latter is my preferred option, there is too little difference to justify separate articles on a rather obscure point. Emoscopes Talk 12:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Destroyers of World War II - Whiteley
 * Conway's all the World's Fighting Ships (1922-1946)
 * Royal Navy Destroyers since 1945 - Marriot


 * You seem to know what you are doing, so you have my support. I've tweaked the merge notice slighty as a to/from. GraemeLeggett 12:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Forgot to give reason - logical route is merge in what is already on wikipedia re the N destroyers, then move the J and K article to J, K and N article. GraemeLeggett 12:13, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * No problems. I'll let this lie for a few days in case there are any dissenters (highly doubtful). In the mean time I'll go busy myself with some War Emergency Programme stuff. Emoscopes Talk 12:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

The N class were J and K class ships prepared to exactly the same designs. In fact the shipyards even re-used the same drawings. Christopher Amano-Langtree Author The Kellys
 * As far as I know, the only major change was to ship "X" 4.7 in mounting in the more logical position facing backwards, the J and K having this training forward, and with a blind spot to the rear. As soon as i can locate my copy of Lenton i can confirm this Emoscopes Talk 04:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC)