Talk:Nadine Strossen

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nadine Strossen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070819062644/http://www.ffeusa.org/html/mission/index.html to http://www.ffeusa.org/html/mission/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:20, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Background
There was no reason to remove some of the information so it was re-supplied. Summerdays1 (talk) 07:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Guardian H is not right with these edits. They insist on reversing my editing. I don't know why wholesale reversals are appropriate, oh wait, they aren't. Summerdays1 (talk) 11:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
 * They included an edit summary, did you address it? Regards, Thinker78  (talk) 01:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * They, Guardian H, are not limiting bad editing to this article. Do you see how they continue to remove facts and sentences? It appears they don't want certain things published. Very little has to do with "the lede". Summerdays1 (talk) 15:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The main focus of this talk page is Nadine Strossen though. Although it is reasonable to mention relevant problems in other pages, you did not answer the question I have. Regards, Thinker78  (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * May I point out that you have "thinker" in your name? It is not cerebral to look at the editing differences. That editor is taking out specific facts about Nadine Strossen and her family. I guess it is less than 8 things; are you wantng a list? Summerdays1 (talk) 09:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I see you have been in Wikipedia only for a couple of months so you may not be familiar with relevant guidance.
 * According to the consensus policy,
 * Per Achieving consensus through editing,
 * Regards, Thinker78  (talk) 23:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * (chiming in after declining 3O filing on the basis of no discussion existing at the time the filing was posted) Regarding the first part of your comment, I recommend that you review WP:NPA and consider striking it as a show of good-faith. Please focus on content, not contributors. DonIago (talk) 04:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Regards, Thinker78  (talk) 23:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * (chiming in after declining 3O filing on the basis of no discussion existing at the time the filing was posted) Regarding the first part of your comment, I recommend that you review WP:NPA and consider striking it as a show of good-faith. Please focus on content, not contributors. DonIago (talk) 04:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)