Talk:Nadir Godrej

Wealth etc
We probably need an article for the Godrej family because (a) individually, some of them are not notable and (b) their wealth is shared. Furthermore, vague newspaper talk relating to perfectly normal business practices - investing in other businesses - is rarely notable. And statements of religious belief require self-identification per WP:BLP and WP:BLPCAT. I have expressed some concerns about the editing habits of the person who keeps reinstating this information - something is not right (AGF or no AGF) when someone admits to having used multiple accounts but is not prepared to reveal them because they claim exemption. Yes, the exemption does exist but the battling that is going on merely raises suspicions, sorry. - Sitush (talk) 14:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)


 * We do have an article for the Godrej family. It can be found at Godrej family. That being said, many of them are notable in their own right, in that they have individually been extensively covered by the press - Adi Godrej, Nadir Godrej, and Jamshyd Godrej would all seem to qualify. (There are issues raised by the fact that different publications ascribe wealth differently, even differing between articles in the same publication.)


 * You can express concerns all you like about my editing habits, although they belong more appropriately on my talk page. Your repeated claims that "something is not right" is beginning to feel like harassment - I am claiming a perfectly legitimate exemption. That's the point of the exemption. If you would like to pursue a checkuser in the absolute absence of any evidence whatsoever of misconduct on my part, go ahead, and I'll look forward to your apology when it's concluded - assuming you can find someone willing to do it, given the abovementioned lack of evidence that I'm up to no good. Sigh. Mandalini (talk) 14:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)