Talk:Naginata

Naginata as sport should be listed under this article not under naginatajutsu. Naginata left the suffix of "way" after WW2 and also dropped the prefix "atarashii" pretty quick. Naginata as a sport is simply Naginata なぎなた. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.217.213.99 (talk) 21:26, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

I removed the sentence "During the Edo Period all Japanese women were required to master the naginata by age 18."; perhaps some segment such as samurai women in some geographic location or women in the &#332;oku were required to master it?

Naginatakas
This page previously read: Naginatakas were often used to create space at the battlefield. User:66.195.118.2 has changed the first word of that sentence to "naginatas" under the assumption it was a misspelling. My assumption however is that this is the Japanese suffix -ka as in karateka "practicioner of Karate." So it is probably not a misspelling.

That said, I'm not sure if I should revert it or not: the term naginataka was not explained elsewhere in the article (making it easy to assume it was just a misspelling) and the sentence still makes fairly good sense with the change.

So should we leave it as it is, revert it, or perhaps go a third way and change it to "Soldiers armed with naginatas..."?

--Iustinus 17:14, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


 * As a naginata practicioner myself, the term "naginatika" is not commonly used to describe naginata practicioners. The Southern California Naginata Federation's web glossary does include the term, although I have never heard it or seen it in print outside of that glossary, so I wouln't consider it to be a final authoritative source, it may have arisen only in Western practice.  Many of the Japanese martial arts, do not use the -ka suffix.


 * I do think we should revert it, as the term, even if relevant is being used improperly. Soldiers in a battlefield context would not be referred to as "naginatikas", they would be referred to by their rank or position on the battlefield (sohei, samurai, etc...).  The sentence is intended to show that the naginata, in a battlefield situation, was significant because, like other pole arms, it could distance the user from their attacker, putting attackers with hand to hand weapons at a disadvatage.  The weapon's role is what is being described, not the training of the user.  Glowimperial 19:23, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Excellent points. However I cannot understand the text as you have ammended it: "Naginatas were often used by both foot soldiers to create space on the battlefield." What do you mean by "both foot soldiers"? Surely this is some sort of error. --Iustinus 06:37, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It was an error. It originally was going to read Naginatas were often used by both foot soldiers and cavalry to create space on the battlefield., but I removed the cavalry reference, as the naginata wouldn't have been used by cavalry as a space clearing or crowd control weapon, the cavalry use of the naginata is not well documented, and I can't speak directly to it's function, other than as a weapon, when used by cavalry.  I'll fix the entry now. Glowimperial 14:28, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Appearance in fiction
It seems to me that in an article like this, having a pop-culture list is particularly senseless. I mean, the naginata is a fairly well-know weapon, so of course it's going to appear all over. It seems like having a list of movies in which swords or spears have appeared. --Iustinus 20:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I've had the same thought. I think there is room for the section, though  It should be for notable apperances in  fiction only.  What is a notable apperance?  Using the sword as an example Excalibur's apperance in the Grail stories would be good example of notable.  I'm not sure what notable apperances the naginata makes in historical Japanese fiction, and research into the subject would be difficult, as naginatas and spears are often confused in both original versions and moreso in translations of Japanese literature, both historical and fictional.


 * A catalog of every anime, video game or manga giving as little as a brief glimpse of the naginata is not helpful to the end user. In those narratives, the naginata is often depicted as a much more dynamic/showy weapon than it is in those fictions, and they provide no real information as to it's real world practice or forms. That's not to say that there shouldn't be mention of it's interpretation in fiction - swords are portrayed in fiction just as unrealistically. Glowimperial 01:15, 21 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree that an exhaustive listing of every appearance of naginata or naginata-like weapons would not be productive, since, as previously mentioned, the actual construction and usage of the weapon differ significantly from how it is often portrayed. Many of the references given are not of naginata at all, but of other polearm weapons such as the Chinese Kwan Dao, or entirely fictional weapons, such as the reference to Matt Cauthon's polearm in The Wheel of Time.  I haved removed a number of erroneous references, however, I do believe the list should stay as a helpful supplement to the photos provided.  I have to disagree with the original statement that the naginata is a "well-known weapon".  Prior to when I took up the study of the naginata, I had never heard of it, and I have never once encountered someone other than a kendo practicioner who had heard of it. ReMarkAble 02:30, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * It certainly seems to be "well known" in the East: pretty much every period movie or anime shows someone using a naginata (or attempts to: as you say the construction might not be right). Even in the West it shows up in a lot of movies that take place in Japan or the greater Orient. Not to mention the slew of video games still listed. It still seems to me that this is a waste of engergy: it's too commonly depicted a weapon, and fans of this-or-that video game or movie are going to keep adding every little reference to the list. --Iustinus 04:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Contradiction
The article on the nagamaki says the naginata can trace its origins back to the BCs.


 * The article on nagamaki is incorrect. The early origins of the naginata are still murky.   I'll try to sort it out. Glowimperial 12:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Good ref for you guys
"Developed a thousand years ago as warriors’ pole-arms, naginata later passed to samurai wives for defense. Eventually, “a fine naginata became a requisite item in the dowry of a samurai bride,” said Ray Sosnowski, a Maryland engineer, Zen lay priest and instructor of weapons arts. In 1912, naginata was introduced in Japanese high schools, where it remains a staple of girls’ physical education. Though Japanese men disdain it, perhaps half the roughly 200 United States naginata practitioners are male, Mr. Sosnowski estimated. Today’s naginata are slender and lightweight, up to seven and a half feet long, with curved tips of wood or bamboo. Their use — to batter, stab or hook an opponent — makes sense for women, as it relies on “the centripetal force of rotating hips, of swinging arms, and of the long, rotating weapon” rather than upper-body strength, Mr. Sosnowski explained....For naginata information, go to naginata.org/naginata.html."

"Choose Your Weapon: Exotic Martial Arts", ''New York Times, Mandy Katz; April 15, 2009. --129.49.17.136 (talk) 18:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Incorporated; thanks for the research. --Gwern (contribs) 23:01 24 April 2009 (GMT)

The use of this citation in the entry is incorrectly formatted for Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AntiangelicAngel (talk • contribs) 05:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Pronounciation
Is this pronounced na-gi-nata or nanguinata? The gi is as in give?--Jondel (talk) 17:17, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Nakinata, bisento, glaive
Not thinking these are alike--the bisento and glaive are more more 'cleaving blades', more similar to the dao, while the naginata is much more similar to the katana. Ie, there is a much more uniform blade width for the naginata. Not sure if there IS a comparable European weapon. Theblindsage (talk) 08:55, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Leverage
"The long shaft offered it more leverage in comparison to the hilt of the katana, enabling the naginata to cut more efficiently."

This statement is incorrect. Mechanical advantage is not sought in the construction of a bladed weapon, at least, not typically. Certain weapons, such as axes and maces, do use mechanical advantage (and weight) to inflict maximum damage. But in general, the speed of the weapon is the important thing, for which you require mechanical disadvantage. For example, if I have a weapon which is 3ft long, 2ft blade and 1ft hilt, assuming the guard to be the axis of rotation, I have a mechanical advantage of 1/2. In a lever, this would be awful; I'd have to exert fifty pounds of force to lift twenty five pounds of weight. In a sword, this is optimal. Here's why. Imagine I move the hilt 90 degrees, a distance of about 1.5ft in one second. The other half of the lever, the blade, has to move to the same angle, but because it's twice as long as the hilt, it moves about 3ft. IN THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME. Thus it is moving twice as fast as the hilt, which is the reason swords are built like they are. It's about speed, not force. It's a rather persistent myth that force pressure is what damages you when hit; it is not. It is the speed of that force pressure. Most swords weigh less than a kilo. It's the same idea as a gunshot, really. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.180.172.50 (talk) 21:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I second this. The naginata is long because it gives more reach, not because it makes cutting more efficient. In fact, leverage makes cutting less efficient, because not only is edge alignment more difficult to get right, but draw cuts are also more difficult to get right. If you try to use leverage when cutting with this kind of weapon, that's the easiest way to damage it. There's a reason why you never see anyone tackle more than one tatami roll at a time with a naginata, but with a sword you can cut through many - precisely because your hands are closer to the centre of percussion, which is in the blade. With a polearm of sufficient length, with a substantial amount of shaft between the forward hand and the blade, the centre of percussion is still in the shaft. This can be remedied by gripping farther towards the blade, but then you sacrifice reach. Bottom line is, the sword will always be a more efficient cutter than the polearm. Tsuka (talk) 01:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naginata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120204081704/http://home.earthlink.net/~steinrl/nihonto.htm to http://home.earthlink.net/~steinrl/nihonto.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:35, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Photo Inconsistency
The colour photo is said to be from 1870. Color photography was not commercial at that time. The odds of it being authentic are very low. Plus I wonder if those pants aren't modern.

Pole/shaft/hilt
I've learned from the other wiki (a russian-lang one) that unlike a pole-arm weapon, which has a "pole" or "shaft", naginata has a "hilt". Is it only because of the oval cros-section of naginata's hilt? The rus. article doesn't have detailed explanation on that point. But as I opened eng. article I saw that there is no mention about such peculiarity at all. I think that point should be enlightened in the article. With a reference to a literature. I probably could've done it by myself but I think native-english-speaking someone could do it faster, easier and correctly. -- Nikelsad (talk) 00:58, 26 July 2018 (UTC)