Talk:Nahikari García/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 11:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

I should have this done by Sunday JAG  UAR   11:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The lead needs expanding quite a bit to summarise the article's body
 * " The programme wasn't solely football based" - was not
 * "She ended the campaign with 10 goals to her name for the season" - can this have a citation?
 * "García has worn the number 7 jersey for both club and country" - missing word?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No original research found.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

The lead definitely needs expanding before I can promote this. I also picked out a couple of minor issues but other than that the article is solid. JAG UAR   18:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks a lot for the review of this article, and for the others you assisted with. It is greatly appreciated. I have extended the lede a bit. Let me know if that is enough. Cheers, Liam E. Bekker (talk) 22:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for expanding the lead! There's nothing else outstanding, so I'll promote this now. It's generally well written and comprehensive for the subject.  JAG  UAR   10:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)