Talk:Nahum Shahaf/Archive 3

Unclear
Sorry it's not clear where the above comments sign off? (Looks like Gideon Levy is a Wkipedian now?) Guessing, did Jaakobou write something and George reverted a part of it and added a new comment in the middle? Don't want to delete others' comments but I also request removal of the interpretation of "RomaC's Position" as implied above. I prefer presenting my opinions all by myself, thanks.

Re the content on involvement in Rabin assassination theories, as I said before I see no need to detail this, and don't think it should have its own section. There was no information at all and now there is too much information. A couple of phrases/sentence, as background on Shahaf's other such investigations pre-Al-Durrah, that's all.

On the other points I repeat, this is a BLP and we have to be certain the sources are reliable and verifiable, a CV that we don't know was written by the subject is twice removed from that criteria. I must say, it seems some editors here are evaluating the sources not on the basis of their reliability and verifiability, but on the basis of how they treat the subject. Respectfully, RomaC (talk) 02:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, Jaakobou wrote the material above. He had a section named "George desired additions", and included his understanding of my view. I felt it looked like I had written it when I hadn't, so I simply replaced it with my own thoughts. Hopefully that clears it up. ← George talk 05:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * As it stands it appears you wrote the entire section I don't see Jaak's signature anywhere? RomaC (talk) 05:31, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * He wrote everything above and below the section named "Comments by George". I was just replying to his commentary in the first section. ← George talk 05:36, 25 March 2010 (UTC)