Talk:Nakajima A4N

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 10:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Questions about source
naval-encyclopedia.com claims to based on several sources https://naval-encyclopedia.com/naval-aviation/ww2/japan/nakajima-a4n.php, but the account of the trials disagrees with Mitsubishi A6M Zero By James D’Angina (Page 8). I am commenting it out for now, after questions were raised. Dog dump was in this source, seems to be a slang term for a close in dogfight, I think jargon that we can leave out of the article. Hopefully in time we can get more accurate information about this aircraft's development and testing. A75 (talk)


 * Appears to be a self-published source WP:SPS and not acceptable as a reliable source. I've not seen that source used in any Wikipedia aircraft articles on my watchlist (circa 5,000). Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by)  16:17, 8 December 2023 (UTC)