Talk:Nam tiến

Why no mention of...
Why no mention of French Indochina, the Japanese takeover of WWII, or the Vietnam War? 68.37.254.48 (talk) 15:15, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Could be useful. Please add information if you know something. Nerd271 (talk) 17:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nam tiến. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150626122653/http://www.chamtoday.com/index.php/history-l-ch-s/78-the-uprisings-of-katip-sumat-and-ja-thak-wa-1833-1835 to http://www.chamtoday.com/index.php/history-l-ch-s/78-the-uprisings-of-katip-sumat-and-ja-thak-wa-1833-1835

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

About "Han" phrase
I'm Vietnamese I can talk "Han" phrase in this article is wrong. "Han" is not individual phrase about Chinese, more than it's not about Han dynasty. All three, Chinese, Vietnamese, Korea used "Han" phrase with meant cultural, cultural people, civilized or civilized people. That's word opposite meant with barbarians. Vietnamese meant they civilized more than their neighbor: Chams, Laos, Khmer, Thai. The same, Korean call their nation is De Han Min Kuk (대한민국), "Han" not about Chinese anyway, like Vietnamese "Han" phrase just meant civilized. although, all that from an origin word. Đông Minh (talk) 05:31, 5 October 2018 (UTC)


 * OK. Please provide sources, then. We need reliable verifiable sources, not word of mouth. That's how it works in on Wikipedia. Nerd271 (talk) 17:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)