Talk:Nama people

Untitled
Are the authors sure that the name should be Namaqua? I am under the impression that the name of the tribe is and always was Nama, not Namaqua. The article states that the older sources used the term Namaqua. I would like those sources to be indicated since I don't beleive that this is correct.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 August 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mulhearno1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

SA government returned their lands?
I do not have enough information on this to write a section in this article, but I learned of some vague news that South African government returned their lands that were seized by the british colonialists for diamond mines. Seems to me this would be significant enough of an event to document for this article. Maybe someone else has leads on this? Casimirpo (talk) 16:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nama people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100610194604/http://slaveryinstitute.wordpress.com/slavery-in-the-cape/ to http://slaveryinstitute.wordpress.com/slavery-in-the-cape/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029195955/http://www.namibiansun.com/content/national-news/bridging-hundred-year-old-separation to http://www.namibiansun.com/content/national-news/bridging-hundred-year-old-separation

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:27, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Lacking bibliographic data
There are citations to Pool 1979; Nuhn 1989; Bley 1971:142–169; Drechsler 1966:132-167; and Gewald 1999:141-230 without additional bibliographic data to identify these sources. As these sources purport to detail the ill treatment of indigenous peoples by the Germans, which is otherwise not well-sourced, it would seem prudent to adequately identify these for verification purposes.
 * The book is probably the correct one for "Drechsler 1966:132-167", if someone is willing to check.
 * "Gewald 1999" is likely.
 * "Bley 1971" is likely
 * "Pool 1979" is likely (Which I believe was his dissertation.) It seems to have been republished in a slightly revised edition in 2016 by Protea Boekhuis in Pretoria, isbn=978-1-4853-0594-1.
 * "Nuhn 1989" ?= Nuhn, Walter (1989) Sturm uber Sudwest: Der Hereroaufstande von 1904 - Ein duster es Kapitel der deutschen kolonialen Vergangenheit Namibias, (Koblenz).

Is there any interest in verifying these? --Bejnar (talk) 21:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Adding New Information
Hi, I am currently working on adding in two new sections, one is about Settlements and the other is about Burials.--Mulhearno1 (talk) 23:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Social sciences(history)
Difference between khoikho and the first farmers 41.114.207.14 (talk) 15:48, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

This article is not very good
yeah --Troopersho (talk) 12:15, 19 May 2023 (UTC)