Talk:Named LNWR "Prince of Wales" Class locomotives

this needs to be merged/completed
Points:


 * 1) is there any reason why this isn't in the LNWR Prince of Wales Class article?  We can have collapsible tables.
 * 2) This table needs to be completed to include the unnamed locomotives as well.  There is no reason why the named ones are more important than the unnamed ones.

Tony May (talk) 11:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The article is about the 100+ named locos. Nearly 60% of the 246-strong class were never named. -- Red rose64 (talk) 16:18, 17 March 2012 (UTC)


 * exactly, and we don't need it. What is needed is a list of all of the engines.  If that means that 60% of one column is blank, so be it - there are other columns. Tony May (talk) 19:29, 17 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm impressed by your willingness to spend several hours typing in the vital statistics of 146 randomly-numbered locos, and I look forward to glancing at the result. Ning-ning (talk) 21:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)