Talk:Nampo Dam

Image of the West Sea Barrage
I've put a request in with with the Korea Computer Center through their website for the image of the West Sea Barrage located at  for use in this article. I'll post when I hear back. kev. (talk) 01:31, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Use of the term "controversial" as the article's second word
I've just removed the word "controversial" as the second word of the article. In my opinion, there's a place to discuss the controversy, which can be in the later paragraph starting, "Foreign critics..." However, for an encyclopedia article about the barrage as a structure, the introductory phrase shouldn't be "the controversial Nampho Dam..." Of course, I welcome discussion here if anyone should feel the need to revert and discuss. And, this is not to say that the adverse effects from the barrage cannot be discussed later in the article. Saebvn (talk) 22:39, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

rewrite
this article needs to be rewritten it's terrible.--71.170.100.11 (talk) 07:50, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nampo Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110806161310/http://www.travelthewholeworld.com/northkorea.html to http://www.travelthewholeworld.com/northkorea.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Tidal barrage?
The article says the dam is a tidal barrage. However, the tidal barrage article says that a tidal barrage is designed for power generation. There is no suggestion that the Nampo Dam is doing that.--Jack Upland (talk) 22:44, 13 July 2019 (UTC)