Talk:Nan Tuck's ghost

2010 comment
I have rephrased the article in my own words and am waiting for a moderator to check this is suitable. The page has used the reference article as a lose base.


 * The article is still an almost exact copy of the source - you should completely re-write it using the source as a reference. After that, you should consider whether this is notable - I think it's marginal. Thanks, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Ok give me a couple of days as I am working on other projects at the moment.


 * Hi again, 03jmgibbens, I took ten minutes out of my busy schedule to re-write this. It wasn't difficult. You should now consider its notability. Thanks, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:43, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Ok thank you very much I really appreciate the help you have given. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 03jmgibbens (talk • contribs) 08:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)