Talk:Nana Achampong

Review under Wikipedia's new article curation / review process
Thanks for your work on this article. As a part of Wikipedia's new article review / curation process I just reviewed the article.

In my opinion, this topic, to the extent visible in the article does not establish meeting Wikipedia's notability guidelines which is a requirement for existence of a separate article on topic. This guideline is described at WP:Notability and in the specialized guidelines linked at the beginning of that page which provide somewhat of an alternate. If you feel that the subject of the article can meet wikipedia's notability guidelines, may I suggest that you bolster the article in those areas. The core element of wp:notability is that there are some independent published sources which covered the topic of the article in depth. I looked at all of the references (except current #1 which is malfunctioning) and found only one source with suitable coverage.

There is also some concern that the editor obviously is wiki-experienced yet has only a small number of lifetime edits under this user name, all of the dedicated to them individual who is the topic of the article. And the first lifetime edit under the username was a somewhat complete article including references. But IMO the article is well-written and neutrally written.

Nevertheless the article comes close to establishing wp:notability for the topic and I'm passing it as reviewed. My suggestion would be to find 1 or two more references of the type described above. I also decided to not tag the article and instead am only noting the concerns on the article talk page. Nice work! North8000 (talk) 12:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work! See notes at article talk page..

North8000 (talk) 12:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)