Talk:Nanban (2012 film)/Archive 1

Name Changes
Why is the name of the film being changed constantly? ie Namban to Moovar (a re-direct to Namban. This is why wp:Crystal Ball articles are a pain. And no refereneces, this article should probably be deleted! - 220.101 talk\Contribs 15:53, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Budget
Found many sites citing the budget of the film as 60 crores.
 * kollyinsider.com
 * way2sms and may more. Is this the actual budget or fake one? Karthik Nadar (talk) 13:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * If we get any contradicting sources, we can change it. Till then, it seems all right.  Secret of success  Talk to me  11:29, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Edit request on 1 January 2012
DATE OF RELEASE HAS BEEN 12TH JANUARY 2012 PUBLISHED IN DAILY NEWSPAPER ON 01-01-2012

Jeeva bharathi (talk) 06:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. This source says it will release on Thai Pongal, which is the 14th or 15th this year. — Bility (talk) 03:57, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Release date updated with proper sources.WikiMan88 (talk) 07:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 2 January 2012
vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information

117.206.50.208 (talk) 06:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Proper edit made.All Izz Well!!! WikiMan88 (talk) 07:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 3 January 2012
pls put another poster

117.213.53.9 (talk) 15:08, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Poster updated.WikiMan88 (talk) 15:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 5 January 2012
vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information

117.206.50.198 (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ❌ What "wrong information"? Please clarify what needs to be changed and indicate why your request is necessary -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 13:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 5 January 2012
you hav written that inital reports sujjested that surya was the front runner for 3 idiots remake....that's absolutely wwrong vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information.

117.213.48.111 (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * ❌: None of the site mentions that Vijay was the first runner, but TOI clearly mentions that the first tunner was Surya. -- Karthik Nadar 11:07, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Owe an apology. The info were actually right. Keep up the spirit. -- Karthik Nadar 14:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 6 January 2012
Those sites clearly mentiones that vijay was the front runner and surya was the second choice..Gemini film circuits initially signed up with vijay for the remake of 3 idiots..later he walked out due to some reasons,,then surya was the next choice.. see this http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html Or see this.....jst see the last paragraph .. Vijay, who were the first choice of 3 Idiots remake, have walked out of it due to various reasons. Then the makers thought of remaking it with Surya in both the languages. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details

117.206.61.49 (talk) 13:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

✅: Good work. -- Karthik Nadar 14:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The Times of India article is from 8 January 2010, and says that Suriya was the very first person considered for the lead role, but he immediately declined. (Please note, nowhere it is mentioned that Suriya actually was signed for the film, he never was part of the film, he was just considered for the role!) Vijay then was signed and left it by December 2010. Suriya was again considered for the role, before Vijay "came back" (as Sify cites!) in January 2011. Everything absolutely correct! Johannes003 (talk) 16:07, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * And please note another point: When Suriya was considered first for the role in January 2010, neither Gemini Film Circuit nor Shankar were part of the project. Vijay was only signed after Shankar was confirmed as the director and GFC confirmed as the production studio! Doubts clear? Johannes003 (talk) 16:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Still a lot confused, though looks true. -- Karthik Nadar 16:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 7 January 2012
..

117.206.48.234 (talk) 07:42, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

That article was completely wrong.Even vijay had said in many interviews that he want to act in the remake of 3 idiots and is in the plan of remaking it.Only one article says that suriya was the front runner.Then only gemini film circuits signed up with shankar and vijay for the remake of 3 idiots.Surya was not any part of the film.No other website says that surya was the front runner.You are absolutely wrong.kindly change this wrong information.


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 07:57, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 7 January 2012
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-12-05/news-interviews/28224406_1_vijay-film-latest-buzz http://www.southdreamz.com/2010/07/vijays-next-movies-with-seeman-lingusamy-shankar-vikaram-k-kumar.html http://www.tamilnow.com/magazine/vijay-with-3-idiots-377.html jst see these websites..surya was not a part of project

117.206.48.234 (talk) 08:00, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information 117.206.50.198

117.206.48.234 (talk) 08:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting wait.svg Already done Please stop making multiple requests after the first one has been already marked as done. Thank you. -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 08:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Nothing is done..no changes have been done so far........???????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.206.48.234 (talk) 18:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 8 January 2012
surya was not a part of the project.....the article on toi was wrong,,,no other swebsites says about it,,,,,,so remove it..

117.213.48.223 (talk) 08:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Already discussed above. Please take a look.  X.One   SOS  09:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Request to add more reviews and critical response by username "Kamalakannan1985"

Edit request on 12 January 2012
In the critical reception section I would like to add

Nanban - 3.5/5, Very nice and touching film, blends message with super fun in the right proposition. It's teamwork of Shankar, Vijay & rest. Source : https://twitter.com/#!/sri50

Its all show of Vijay. Nanban Rating 3.5/5. source : http://www.kollyinsider.com/2012/01/nanban-movie-online-review-nanban.html

all is well. source : http://www.top10cinema.com/review/14099/nanban

Nanban a journey for everyone. source : :http://pluzmedia.com/reviews/kollywood/27621/nanban-movie-review

Nanban rocks.. he ends up as an adorable friend. source : http://movies.sulekha.com/tamil/nanban/reviews/90453.htm

Nanban - 4.5/5. source : http://www.accesskollywood.com/moviereview-id-nanban-review68.htm

Nanban - 4.5/5. source : http://cini.in/reviews/movie-reviews/nanban-movie-review/

Nanban - 4/5. http://reviews.in.88db.com/index.php/movie/movie-reviews/14917-nanban-tamil-movie-review

nanban - 4/5. source : http://www.supergoodmovies.com/37054/kollywood/nanban-movie-review-movie-review-details

Kamalakannan1985 (talk) 05:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ❌ — Sorry, none of them are notable or reliable sources except Sulekha. This can be done after the article is rid of unnotable reviews.  X.One   SOS  15:04, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 13 January 2012
Sify gave 5/5 stars ...pls include that also..

117.206.52.8 (talk) 09:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px|link=|alt=]] N Not done. Sify ratings are user generated like ImDb and they only give a verdict of the film in words.  X.One   SOS  15:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 14 January 2012
sify gave 5/5 stars

117.206.59.216 (talk) 09:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * See above. The rating is not given by the reviewer, it is user generated.  X.One   SOS  09:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 14 January 2012
lo;..nanban budjet is not 25 crores

117.206.59.216 (talk) 16:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Changed.WikiMan88 (talk) 17:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 15 January 2012
post the collection upto 2 days

117.206.58.248 (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Additionally, stop spamming this talk page with multiple requests. Please try to only make ONE request, containing EXACTLY of what you need done, instead of making a million. -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 04:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 15 January 2012
3 days Box office collection report to be added in Box Office Section :

Nanban 2nd week collection is 125.2 crores source : http://superwoods.com/news-id-vijay-nanban-27-01-12805.htm

Kamalakannan1985 (talk) 12:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ❌ Sources aren't reliable. -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 04:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 16 January 2012
Thanks for the above reply. I am hereby attaching a reliable source. Kindly consider the below : Nanban 15 days collection stands 120.5 crores :

http://www.kollyinsider.com/2012/01/nanban-4-day-box-office-collections.html

http://www.cinemamasti.com/news/nanban-four-days-collections.html

Kamalakannan1985 (talk) 10:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

❌: Neither these are reliable sources. -- Karthik Nadar 12:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 16 January 2012
give the collecciotns of nanban so far

117.206.59.144 (talk) 09:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

❌: Source? -- Karthik Nadar 12:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 17 January 2012
pls post the collection of 57 crores in 5 days

117.206.58.123 (talk) 09:39, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 *  X.One   SOS  13:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 17 January 2012
An article in india today says that nanban had grossed more than 50 crores...is that a reliable source for u.........jst check it...then post

117.206.58.123 (talk) 09:40, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * . Referring to this? Well, not in the infobox, but definitely worth in the Box office section, where its already noted using a Oneindia.in source. Thanks.  X.One   SOS  13:36, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 17 January 2012
nanban collections,,,,,,,releable source http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/news/2012/vijay-nanban-collects-57-box-office-170112.html

117.206.58.123 (talk) 15:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Please check.It is already updated with the same source you have providing now.WikiMan88 (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 19 January 2012
Please add the following : The movie, in its first weekend, has raked in £ 1,17,846 [approx. Rs. 92.77 lacs]. It was released in 24 screens and the per show average stands at £ 4,910. Whereas, other Tamil release Vettai on 15 screens has collected £ 17,605 [approx. Rs. 13.86 lacs].

There are two sources for this news. I can get you more if required. sources : http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/news/2012/vijay-collection-international-box-office-190112.html

http://www.moviecrow.com/News/597/box-office-report---jan-16

Please add the following for chennai BO : Nanban has netted a record Rs 2.27 crores in four days at CBO, which is outstanding.

Source : http://www.sify.com/movies/boxoffice.php?id=14989093&cid=13525926

Kamalakannan1985 (talk) 11:16, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

✅: Info added with reference to sources from Oneindia.in and Sify.com. Moviecrow.com is not a reliable source. -- Karthik Nadar 06:57, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 19 January 2012
1st week box office collection is only 20 cores

sources :

http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/regional/nanban-is-not-raking-the-moolah-bo-reports-false_104112.html

www.kollyinsider.com/.../nanban-4-day-box-office-collections.html

Nirosanda (talk) 05:52, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

❌: Kollyinsider.com is not an reliable source. Regarding Zee News, the source cant be trusted because even they are confused. Check here. -- Karthik Nadar 07:00, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

How can you say "www.kollyinsider.com/.../nanban-4-day-box-office-collections.html" is an unreliable source ??? Check behindwoods it's telling the Chennai BO, where sify is telling another. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nirosanda (talk • contribs) 10:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 19 January 2012
pls give a new poster

117.206.52.164 (talk) 15:08, 19 January 2012 (UTC) ❌: Why you want new poster everyday? Why don't you upload it and add it. -- Karthik Nadar 16:25, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 19 January 2012
please change the following : Nanban first week collection is less than 20 cores. please, change it

source : http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/news/2012/vijay-nanban-box-office-report-180112.html

hello zee news were the first site to wrongly claim it collected 20 crores bcoz of them only all the other sites said the same report but now zeenews themselves have reported that they wrongly informed it and they again reported the exact collection is 61 crore for first week from reliable sources.

you are total wrong it's not zee news it is entertainment.oneindia.in. If, you have no idea please check the time.

hello then wat about this reference below the next day 19th from oneindia mentioning that the domestic gross(tamil nadu gross)is only 20c in first weekend  and it is not the worldwide gross.so they themselves are confused we cant use them.

http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/news/2012/vijay-collection-international-box-office-190112.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.18.210 (talk) 06:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Also, first week chennai box office collection is 1.37 cores, it has been confirmed by behindwoods. Behindwoods is the official BO report provider for Chennai, not Sify.

source : http://www.behindwoods.com/tamil-movies-slide-shows/movie-4/top-ten-movies-jan-16/tamil-cinema-topten-movie-nanban.html

Nirosanda (talk) 15:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

hello nirosanda c the behindwoods link its totally wrong the film was released on 12th but collection report of them is from 13th to 15th so its totally unfair to add that collection from behindwoods and they have also mentioned in that link that Pongal special shows are not considered while calculating box office collections. but sify also included the correct collection amount from the day of release(12th) so we have added it.


 * Pongal special shows are not considered while calculating box office collections. This how the box office works. you can't add pongal special shows collections to BO

any ways sify has calculated the exact amount from the day of release 12th and they have not neglected anything such as pongal special shows so we have added sify collection report.A proper site should report the collection from the day of release of the film.sorry we cant use that behindwoods reference — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.18.210 (talk) 06:27, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Pongal special shows rate are much higher that the normal rates, since that we won't add those collection to BO. this, is the tradition so far and it's ridiculous that you trying to change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nirosanda (talk • contribs) 08:06, 20 January 2012 (UTC) whatever the tradition maybe but a film's boxoffice collection report will be added in wikipedia only from the first day of its release not any other day after that as per wikipedia rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.107.163 (talk) 10:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 20 January 2012
pls change the poster

117.206.49.38 (talk) 06:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * . Posters need not be changed unless a specific reason is given. But, I do agree this one has subjective claims and needs to be replaced. I'll see if something can be done.  X.One   SOS  12:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 20 January 2012
i think nanban collections are now increased,,61 c was 6 days collection....according to some sites,,7 days collection is 86c http://www.southmoviemasala.com/mnews/nanban-7-days-collections.html http://superwoods.com/photo-galleries/nanban-7-days-total-collection/01-nanban-7-days-total-collection-vijay.html http://timesofap.com/cinema/tag/nanban-seven-days-collections/ kindly add the collection reports

117.206.49.38 (talk) 06:48, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I appreciate all the efforts you took to get these sites, and the sources seem good, but unfortunately, going by their terms and conditions, they cannot be considered reliable on Wikipedia. If we get a consensus established to use these sites, until a reliable source lets out the gross, then we can consider it. I'll try searching for some.  X.One   SOS  12:44, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 20 January 2012
first week box office report is fake. the correct one is 20cores.

source : www.tamilkey.com/shankars-nanban-box-office-reports-turn-false.html

Done 203.62.175.4 (talk) 08:12, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Tamilkey is not reliable.  X.One   SOS  12:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 20 January 2012
nanban 1week collection 85 c http://loudtwitter.com/nanban_1week/

117.206.55.26 (talk) 15:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The source you mentioned is unlikely to be reliable.  X.One   SOS  07:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 21 January 2012
117.213.49.211 (talk) 05:04, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * No request made.  X.One   SOS  07:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 21 January 2012
.

117.206.59.231 (talk) 17:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px|link=|alt=]] N Not done No request made.  X.One   SOS  06:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 22 January 2012
117.206.62.220 (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px|link=|alt=]] N Not done No request made.  X.One   SOS  06:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 22 January 2012
Nanban 10 days collection reports are out..its 105.2 crores. http://superwoods.com/news-id-nanban-vijay-21-01-12-02728.htm http://www.southmoviemasala.com/mnews/nanban-10-days-collection.html http://apbin.com/link/148220 kindly post them

117.206.58.21 (talk) 18:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

❌: The sources provided are not a reliable source. -- Karthik Nadar 09:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 23 January 2012
pls update the collections so far,,,it grossed more dan 100 cr says many websites..

117.206.62.123 (talk) 13:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

❌: Provide a reliable source, i will update it! -- Karthik Nadar 14:00, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 24 January 2012
117.206.55.29 (talk) 07:09, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

❌: No request made. -- Karthik Nadar 13:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 25 January 2012
Please update the second week collection from Uk and Australian box offices: Australia : The average per show average stands at A$1,429 and the total collection of the movie stands at Rs 56 lacs

Uk ; In the UK Box Office, Nanban, which was released in 24 screens, scored £30,873 in 13 screens, in the second week totalling its overall collections to £1,88,043 (approx. Rs 1.47 crores) http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/news/2012/nanban-vettai-box-office-collections-250112.html

source :  http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/news/2012/nanban-vettai-box-office-collections-250112.html

Kamalakannan1985 (talk) 15:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 14:04, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey Abhishek! Don't you think Oneindia.in is a reliable source? -- Karthik Nadar 12:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Oops! My bad. I was reviewing two pages at the same time, guess I ended up hitting the same reason for both. Apologies for the same.
 * @Karthikndr, have you made the above additions? I have anyways set the answered parameter to no. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 13:28, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * @Abhishek, no apologies dude. We are meant to make mistakes and learn from it. I have ✅ the changes. -- Karthik Nadar 14:11, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Confusion over your reply
Thanks for above reply. I wanted to know if there is any confusion between the editors of this column. I have received the above reply from you (Abhishek191288) asking for a reliable source. The source is actually oneindia.in. Please refer to the answer given by Karthik Nadar for one of the questions about reliable source.the title is : /* Edit request on 1 February 2012 */ the answer given was : "We would welcome sources like Behindwoods.com, The Times of India, Oneindia.in, IndiaGlitz, etc".

My point here is I have posted a news from oneindia.in and got reply that its not reliable but Karthik Nadar says that oneindia gives a reliable source. So you may please update my post or kindly justify your decision rather than blindly calling it a unreliable source..

Kamalakannan1985 (talk) 15:20, 01 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 26 January 2012
How come nanban BO updated as 122.5 cores ???

Can some one provide any source ??

101.2.177.215 (talk) 18:13, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 27 January 2012
nanban box office colllections is absolutely false..........47 crore??? lol........first 4 days it collected 61 crores..u hav written der....nw nw official news came dat nanbn beated businessman collections... Vijay’s Nanban collection beats Businessman!! Friday, Jan 27, 2012 Heavy clash ahead at Box-office after the release of two massive films Tollywood King Prince Mahesh Babu’s Businessman and Kollywood Super Hero Vijay’s Nanban. Vijay’s Nanban which is got positive talk all over and also getting rave reviews from all sides and breaking record collections.Prince Maheshbabu Movie The Bussinessman Released more than 1600 theater ,which also gets rave reviews from all sides and breaking record collections. The two films challenging to one to other no one less compare with collection. Now as the trade reports Nanban collection beats Businessman. Businessman - Total 14 Days Collections 123.2 Crores. Nanban - Total 15 Days Collections 125.2 Crores. http://superwoods.com/news-id-nanbanvijay-jeeva-27-01-12808.htm

thanks for ur effort we will surely add this source if we dont get the collection report from an reliable source until then please wait and keep posting the collection report from superwoods here it will be very much helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.242.184.124 (talk) 13:18, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Kindly remove dat 47 c..

117.206.54.214 (talk) 09:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Request not completed, not reliable source  Chzz  ► 03:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 27 January 2012
PLS change the nanban box office collections from 125.3 crores to 66.92 crores... this is the official collection.... Reference:http://cinema.currentweek.net/2012/01/nanban-second-weekend-collections-first.html

203.99.193.237 (talk) 11:18, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The 125c is unsourced, so I'm removing it for now. There is no proof that the source which you have mentioned is an official source. It doesn't look like an authentic source either. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  13:21, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 27 January 2012
101.63.170.64 (talk) 13:50, 27 January 2012 (UTC) snehitudu the telugu dubbed version of nanban has collected 14.2 crores in its first day in Andhra pradesh update it

http://www.andhramusic.in/2012/01/snehitudu-first-day-collections.html


 * Sorry, not a reliable source  Chzz  ► 03:03, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 29 January 2012
update the collections.......many articles have said that it had crossed 130 crore....and Times of Andhra Pradesh says Three Days Collections of 'Snehithudu' is 41.2 Crores.

117.206.59.187 (talk) 12:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Celestra (talk) 02:16, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 30 January 2012
Nanban first two week collections Rs:72.02 crore Reference:http://cinema.currentweek.net/2012/01/nanban-first-two-weeks-collections.html

203.99.193.81 (talk) 07:25, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

❌: Cinema.currentweek.net not a reliable source. -- Karthik Nadar 14:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 30 January 2012
117.206.60.197 (talk) 13:58, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

❌: No request made. -- Karthik Nadar 14:20, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 01 February 2012
PLease add the following in Box office section:

After completion of 2 weeks, Nanban tops chennai BOx office with a total collection of 6.22 crores till 29th January.

Source : https://www.behindwoods.com/tamil-movies-slide-shows/movie-4/top-ten-movies-jan-30/tamil-cinema-topten-movie-nanban.html

ANd it stands at 7th place in Malaysian Box office as of 29th jan source : http://www.cinema.com.my/charts/charts.aspx

Kamalakannan1985 (talk) 10:35, 01 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 1 February 2012


 211.25.230.34 (talk) 05:47, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

❌: You haven't provided any source! -- Karthik Nadar 06:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 1 February 2012
update the collections tilll nw http://english.bharatone.com/cinema/bharat1/2/1686 http://english.bharatone.com/cinema/bharat1/1/1687 many websites are giving it,,,,but all those are not reliable sources for you,,may be this one too...........i m not posting...

117.206.61.234 (talk) 06:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


 * ❌: The source you provided again is not a reliable source. We would welcome sources like Behindwoods.com, The Times of India, Oneindia.in, IndiaGlitz, etc. -- Karthik Nadar 06:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Nanban is a flop
This film has failed at the box office despite impresive opening. Please change copy accordingly to keep the article free from bias.


 * First 3 days - Rs.20 crore
 * Next 4 days - Rs.10 crore
 * Next 3 days - Rs.5 crore
 * Next 4 days - Rs.2 crore

Global box office receipts in 14 days - Rs.37 crore

Budget - Rs.67 crore

Loss - Rs.30 crore — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.193.47.44 (talk) 07:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

❌: Wikipedia doesn't support your original research, please provide a reliable source supporting your statements. -- Karthik Nadar 12:25, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 1 February 2012
117.206.62.198 (talk) 10:45, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, your edit request did not include any text. If you have a request, please re-enter it. Consider clicking 'Show preview' (next to 'Save page', below), to ensure that your request looks the way you want it to. Please include a link to a reference if the information cannot be confirmed merely by looking at the page, such as a typo or swapping word order. Thanks. Dru of Id (talk) 10:54, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Nanban received negative reviews in Andhra and declared flop. Source - http://www.moviecrow.com/News/628/nanban-telugu-snehitudu-gets-mixed-response Source - http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/regional/nanban-is-not-raking-the-moolah-bo-reports-false_104112.htm

Please update article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.193.43.232 (talk) 12:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Nanban has flopped in Malaysian box office. This is confirmed news.

Malaysia BO (after two weeks): Endhiran - $2,259,459 Singam - $1,131,444 Mankatha - $1,051,643 Nanban - $533,561

Please update.


 * ❌: Regarding Snehitudu, the www.moviecrow.com source you provided is not a reliable source. If you say Nanban has flopped in Malaysian box office, please get me a source for the same, again a reliable one. -- Karthik Nadar 12:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 1 February 2012 - Gross
The movie has grossed INR 99.8 crores in 9 days as per box office reports. Reference link is here : http://www.kollyinsider.com/2012/01/nanban-9-days-box-office-collections.html

115.184.27.135 (talk) 17:33, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done: Please rephrase your request in a 'please change X to Y' manner. I can't tell what it is you would like changed or added and where. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 06:40, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 2 February 2012
117.213.48.67 (talk) 12:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * No request made-- Jac 16888 Talk 12:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 2 February 2012
test

Yogiyogiyogi (talk) 13:32, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

❌: No request made. The user made a test edit. -- Karthik Nadar 13:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 3 February 2012
nanban 22 days collections .. http://superwoods.com/news-id-vijay-nanban-03-02-12-02921.htm dnt knw whether this one is too an unreliable source for u..:P...

117.206.50.234 (talk) 06:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: Please rephrase your request in a 'please change X to Y' manner or your requests will continue to be declined. -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 10:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 3 February 2012
Indiaglitz.com : Ilayathalapathy Vijay's part superhero avatar in and as 'Velayudham' struck a chord among the audience. The film has seen a successful 100 day run in the box-office and has been declared as one of the biggest hits in 2011.Taking a dig on a social issue, the film was welcomed with open arms by his fans and family audience in the urban and rural centers.It was a clean package with a good dosage of action, drama and comedy. It may be mentioned, Vijay's latest offering, 'Nanban', is also seeing a good run in theatres!

117.206.53.240 (talk) 06:57, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: Please rephrase your request in a 'please change X to Y' manner or your requests will continue to be declined. -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 10:10, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 4 February 2012
update the telugu version collections too.

117.206.51.156 (talk) 06:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

❌: Can you get us some info and a reliable source for the same. -- Karthik Nadar 06:23, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 4 February 2012
test

117.213.51.135 (talk) 16:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, your test edit did not include sufficient information to assist an edit request. If you have a request, please re-enter it. Consider clicking 'Show preview' (next to 'Save page', below), to ensure that your request looks the way you want it to. Please include a link to a reference if the information cannot be confirmed merely by looking at the page, such as a typo or swapping word order. Thanks. Dru of Id (talk) 17:03, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 5 February 2012
ha ha ha 72 crores..wikipedia jokes........ha ha ha lol.....wot happnd to the editors?? its an all knwn fact dat the film collected 61 c in the first week ...nd now u hav given jst 72 c upto 2nd week...lol..

117.206.58.145 (talk) 06:53, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done: There is no request. Celestra (talk) 06:59, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 5 February 2012
update the total collections till nw..its only 2 weeks collections?

117.206.56.116 (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 *  X.One   SOS  11:20, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Plot update

 * Stop calling the professor as Virus. His name is Santhanam.
 * Stop calling the prodigal student as Pari. That was his 20-year alias (for school and college). His name is Kosaksi Pasappugazh (aka Pappu). He is the son of a Buddhist Burmese immigrant. Aska Laska song opening lyrics are Burmese. He eats Burmese food in several scenes.
 * [[Image:X mark.svg|18px|link=|alt=]] N Not done — Your POV matters little here. It should be exactly as how it is in the film.  X.One   SOS  18:36, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 5 February 2012
include the telugu verison collections too

117.213.52.106 (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. If a source gives the collection of the Telugu version, we can add it.  X.One   SOS  18:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 6 February 2012
y are you removing the collections?

117.206.48.30 (talk) 13:11, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry but the source is unreliable.Please provide a reliable source.WikiMan88 (talk) 13:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 7 February 2012
46.2 crore (US$32.16 million) is 26 days collections...pls add that too..

117.206.62.162 (talk) 06:00, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 *  X.One   SOS  10:57, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 7 February 2012
117.213.48.252 (talk) 09:27, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: No request made.  X.One   SOS  11:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 7 February 2012
nanban 26 days collection is correct..146.2 crores......add the telugu version collections too..Vijay Snehithudu 12Days Collections is 93.7Crores..so total collections till nw is 239.9 Crores.add that http://english.bharatone.com/cinema/bharat1/2/1776 http://www.southmoviz.com/2012/02/nanban-26-days-collections.html http://superwoods.com/news-id-nanbanvijay-jeeva-07-02-12972.htm

117.206.63.232 (talk) 10:35, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. None of the sources provided are reliable.  X.One   SOS  11:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

k

Edit request on 8 February 2012
colletion budget 20 crore

Sundar85.pandian (talk) 08:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.: Please be more specific about what needs to be changed. -- Karthik Nadar 13:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 27 February 2012
bro total collation is 257.8 cros not 72.02 no 72.02 yes 257.8

38.111.126.187 (talk) 04:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

❌: Could you please provide a reliable source for the same. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 11:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Nanban box office collections
I have nanban 47th Day collection Total Collections is 155.7 Crores

http://superwoods.com/news-id-vijay-nanban-28-02-121235.htm

The Telugu version of the film has made 101.6 Crores in 33 days: Link is below

http://superwoods.com/news-id-snehithudu-vijay-28-02-121240.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarvanan247 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Point Missed
As far as I know, it was officially stated by Shankar that Nanban is a remake of 3 Idiots. Since it is an official remake, the lead section must mention the original film and not just the source book; to point out, Nanban is not a direct adaptation of the book, it is the retelling of a previous adaptation of the book. Perhaps discussion is required on this matter, and I would be happy to see editors discuss this issue. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 17:40, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 3 March 2012
from where u got the total gross collection as 96 crores..its utter rubbbish....kindly remove that wrong statement...or give the source if u r right..in many sites it was given that nanban was second only to endhiran (for eg:behindwoods)..

117.213.54.55 (talk) 07:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * unless you can be specific on what needs to be changed. Please be specific on what is "utter rubbish" and explain why it needs to be removed. -- B  music  ian  08:02, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Box office	96 crore (US$21.12 million)---this is wot u hav to be removed....else give the source of this one,,,?? (in 50 days)

Edit request on 4 March 2012
The official total box office collection of Nanban for 5 weeks is 104 croes. http://www.a2zboxoffice.com/2012/02/nanban-5-weeks-collections-104-crores.html

124.43.97.138 (talk) 13:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I don't think thats a reliable source. Any authentic identification for it would be appreciated.  X.One   SOS  15:38, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 5 March 2012
May I know that andhraboxoffice.com is a reliable source? I have the 1st week Share for Snehithudu.

http://andhraboxoffice.com/info.aspx?id=345&cid=6&fid=550

SharuWikki 11:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Ask that to yourself, and know it.  X.One   SOS  09:58, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Some trash?
The trash that Nanban did well in tollywood box office is not with a reliable information.Kindly check it that nanban was a disaster in A.P.103.5.132.34 (talk) 19:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Tamil Nadu is the major revenue center for Tamil films. Besides, do you have a reference to prove your statement? Otherwise your comment can be treated as WP:POV. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 07:41, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't I know you, IP?  Secret of success  ( talk ) 09:28, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 9 April 2012
you have given the total gross till now as 152 crores....frm a given source...pls check dat blog,,it doesnt show the gross frm telugu version...so,,152 crores is not correct.

117.206.60.207 (talk) 15:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. I searched for "152" in the article and found nothing. I'm not sure what you're requesting is changed, or what reliable source supports the change. Thanks!  &mdash; Jess &middot; &Delta;&hearts; 23:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 19 April 2012
The box office gross of Nanban is 257 Crores.Its mentioned here that the gross is 90 crores.Its incorrect.Pls change it.I work for a news channel and thats how i know. I.e Box office	90 crore should be chanegd to 257 Crore(Tamil version gross of 157 crores and Telugu version gross of 98 crores approx) Nanban 1st Day Collections 15 Crores

2nd Day Collections 14.5 Crores

3rd Day Collections 14 Crores

4th Day Collections 12.6 Crores

5th Day Collections 11.2 Crores

6th Day Collections 10.4 Crores

7th Day Collections 8.3 Crores

8th Day Collections 7.4 Crores

9th Day Collections 6.4 Crores

10th Day Collections 5.8 Crores

11th Day Collections 4.8 Crores

12th Day Collections 4.5 Crores

13th Day Collections 4.3 Crores

14th Day Collections 3.5 Crores

15th Day Collections 3.0 Crores

16th Day Collections 2.9 Crores

17th Day Collections 2.3 Crores

18th Day Collections 2 Crores

19th Day Collections 1.8 Crores

20th Day Collections 1.5 Crores

21th Day Collections 1.8 crores

22th Day collections 1.6 Crores

23rd Day collections 1.5 Crores

24th Day collections 2.1 Crores

25th Day collections 2.0 Crores

26th Day collections 1.9 Crores

27th Day collections 1.8 Crores

28th Day collections 1 Crores

29th Day Collections 1 Crores

30th Day Collections 1 Crores

31st Day Collections 0.8 Crores

32nd Day Collections 0.6 Crores

33rd Day Collections 0.5 Crores

35th Day Collections 0.5 Crores

36th Day Collections 0.5 Crores

37th Day Collections 0.5 Crores

38th Day Collections 0.5 Crores

39th Day Collections 0.4 Crores

40th Day Collections 0.4 Crores

41st Day Collections 0.3 Crores

42nd Day Collections 0.3 Crores

43rd Day Collections 0.3 Crores

44th Day Collections 0.2 Crores

45th Day Collections 0.2 Crores

46th Day Collections 0.2 Crores

47th Day Collections 0.1 Crores

48th Day Collections 0.3 Crores

49th Day Collections 0.3 Crores

50th Day Collections 0.3 Crores

Vignesh Suresh (talk) 11:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 12:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 20 April 2012
you have give as total collection as 90....give d source or remove it.

117.206.56.118 (talk) 08:02, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

✅: Removed it as they were unsourced. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 11:34, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 22 April 2012
Nanban film successfully completed 100 days run.

124.43.102.218 (talk) 16:01, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * ✔️. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 17:46, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 23 April 2012
Total box office collection of nanban is 164 croes

124.43.104.75 (talk) 02:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

❌: The provided sources are not reliable. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 09:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 23 April 2012
please give tha exact box office collection.. is that only 50 c???/ oh my god!!!

117.230.79.104 (talk) 06:49, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

for vettai collection alone wiki follows this web link and put their gross,,, but for nanban they not putting correct box office.. in that same webpage they put 152c but in wiki they just put 50c...

its too bad.. for vettai 57c and nanban jus 50c.. oh god.. pls chnge nanban box offce.. it is  152c http://boxofficeverdicts.blogspot.in/2012/03/nanban-worldwide-gross-collections.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.230.79.104 (talk) 07:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, I have removed the information as it was leading to continuous dispute. However, the source you provided is not a reliable one, and hence couldn't be accepted. Will be great if you manage to get a reliable one. Thank you. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 09:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 23 April 2012
If Oneindia is a reliable source then what do you think about zeenews.com .They have accepted the 1st week collection as 61 crores.So which is reliable? http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/regional/all-is-well-with-nanban-at-the-box-office_104185.htm SharuWikki


 * The Zee news source says that it was a false rumor. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 06:52, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 25 April 2012
It is stated in zee news as clearly in the above link that the box office collection is 61 croes On Wednesday, we had reported sources were claiming that the film is not raking the moolah. But if the latest buzz is to be believed then the Vijay starrer has kept the Box Office busy not only in India but at screens across the globe.

The official fanclub of the Ilaya Thalapathy of Tamil cinema took to the Twitter to slam false reports of ‘Nanban’s Box Office failure.

It tweeted, “Nanban has taken tamil nadu by storm and it`s world wide collection officially is 61 crores. #nanban. Very reliable sources have confirmed(sic).

‘Nanban’ sees veteran actor Sathyaraj playing the eccentric professor Virus, while Jeeva and Srikanth play the best friends of Vijay.

The flick is also doing pretty well in the UK and Australia.

124.43.100.107 (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. I'm sure that's just the opening week collection, regardless of their truth. If that's the amount, why don't other third party sources claim it. Wait for some other sources to claim the gross, and then I will be happy to update it. If you find any reliable sources, just put a edit request. Thank you. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 17:39, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 1 May 2012
In the same way,if the total collection is 50 crores why don't other third party sources claim it. So Wait for some other sources to claim the gross, and immediately remove the total collection as 50 crores.

SharuWikki 10:49, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 3 August 2012
The box office collection report just isn't right!!

Nanban Box office : The film opened with mixed reviews with average occupancy in both multiplexes and single screens in Tamil Nadu District including Chennai and other cities. --X needs to be changed to as below y= 'The film opened to tremendous reviews from critics as well as from family audience The opening week grossed around 40 crores as the multiplexes witnessed 95% theatre occupancy in metros. the movie garnered 157 crores in the first 50 days and 6 crores in the next 50 days celebrating its 100th day at 167 crores. The movies was officially announced as the 2nd highest tamil grosser after Enthiran'

Links : http://www.behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/feb-12-04/nanban-endhiran-24-02-12.html http://www.zimbio.com/Kollywood+Tamil+Movies+Events+News+Updates+Reviews/articles/YnJbq-eQQWd/Nanban+100+Days+Collections+World+Wide+Vijay http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/news/2012/vijay-collection-international-box-office-190112.html http://www.kollyinsider.com/2012/03/nanban-completes-50-days-box-office.html

Stalin2205raj (talk) 19:29, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Not done: You might have good intentions, but I think the text you are adding is simply POV (it has a point of view). However, I'll leave this request open and if anyone else agrees with the OP, feel free to override me. FloBo  A boat that can float!  12:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: as above. Mdann52 (talk) 15:03, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 20 October 2012
Box office should be edited like this..

The film opened with 100% occupancy in both multiplexes and single screens in Tamil Nadu District including Chennai and other cities.[4] It also witnessed 90% occupancy in other countries.[87] On its opening day the film collected around 8.32 crore (US$1.57 million) in india alone[88] and total world wide collection netted around15 crore (US$2.84 million) on the first day.[89] In Chennai city alone the film netted 2.27 crore (US$429,030) in its first weekend,[90] and 4.95 crore (US$0.94 million) at the end of the first week, staying at first place at the Chennai box office.[91][92] It has grossed around 5.89 crore (US$1.11 million) in Chennai after seven weeks,[93] Out of which approximately 1 crore (US$189,000) came from Sathyam Cinemas multiplex.[94] In Coimbatore and Nilgiris area, Nanban opened in 70 screens and netted 5.20 crore (US$0.98 million) in the first week.[4] In Kerala, it grossed 1.39 crore (US$262,710) on the opening day.[95] Nanban also got a great opening at the Bangalore box-office,[96] where it was still featured in Top 5 one month after release.[97] The collections from 4 circuits of Coimbatore were around 5.5 crore (US$1.04 million) in its initial week.[98] On the opening four day weekend the film collected around 57 crore (US$10.77 million)[99] and the total first week collection worldwide netted in86 crore (US$16.25 million)[100].Nanban celebrated 100 days at the box-office on 20 April 2012.[101][102] And the 100 days collection is around 164 crore (US$31 million) only from Nanban excluding snehithudu.[103] The telugu version of Nanban titled "Snehitudu" also opened with a tremendous response, on its opening day it collected around 14.5 crore (US$2.74 million)[104] and the opening weekend collections netted around 82 crore (US$15.5 million)[105]. After three weeks snehitudu reached the 1 billion mark.[106] Therefore the tamil and telugu version of the film has grossed above 265 crore (US$50.09 million) making it the second highest grossing tamil film of all time after Endhiran. And one of the top grossing Indian films. Many fake reports did rounds in the internet regarding the box office collections.[107] Later on the reports were denied and published as a rumour. Stated by zee news India as "reported sources were claiming that the film is not raking the moolah. But if the latest buzz is to be believed then the Vijay starrer has kept the Box Office busy not only in India but at screens across the globe." They later on agreed that the box office figures were originally 61 crore (US$11.53 million) on the opening weekend itself .[108]

117.213.52.123 (talk) 13:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: See below. A boat   that can float!   (watch me float!)  15:24, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 20 October 2012
Box office should be edited like this..

The film opened with 100% occupancy in both multiplexes and single screens in Tamil Nadu District including Chennai and other cities.[4] It also witnessed 90% occupancy in other countries.[87] On its opening day the film collected around 8.32 crore (US$1.57 million) in india alone[88] and total world wide collection netted around15 crore (US$2.84 million) on the first day.[89] In Chennai city alone the film netted 2.27 crore (US$429,030) in its first weekend,[90] and 4.95 crore (US$0.94 million) at the end of the first week, staying at first place at the Chennai box office.[91][92] It has grossed around 5.89 crore (US$1.11 million) in Chennai after seven weeks,[93] Out of which approximately 1 crore (US$189,000) came from Sathyam Cinemas multiplex.[94] In Coimbatore and Nilgiris area, Nanban opened in 70 screens and netted 5.20 crore (US$0.98 million) in the first week.[4] In Kerala, it grossed 1.39 crore (US$262,710) on the opening day.[95] Nanban also got a great opening at the Bangalore box-office,[96] where it was still featured in Top 5 one month after release.[97] The collections from 4 circuits of Coimbatore were around 5.5 crore (US$1.04 million) in its initial week.[98] On the opening four day weekend the film collected around 57 crore (US$10.77 million)[99] and the total first week collection worldwide netted in86 crore (US$16.25 million)[100].Nanban celebrated 100 days at the box-office on 20 April 2012.[101][102] And the 100 days collection is around 164 crore (US$31 million) only from Nanban excluding snehithudu.[103] The telugu version of Nanban titled "Snehitudu" also opened with a tremendous response, on its opening day it collected around 14.5 crore (US$2.74 million)[104] and the opening weekend collections netted around 82 crore (US$15.5 million)[105]. After three weeks snehitudu reached the 1 billion mark.[106] Therefore the tamil and telugu version of the film has grossed above 265 crore (US$50.09 million) making it the second highest grossing tamil film of all time after Endhiran. And one of the top grossing Indian films. Many fake reports did rounds in the internet regarding the box office collections.[107] Later on the reports were denied and published as a rumour. Stated by zee news India as "reported sources were claiming that the film is not raking the moolah. But if the latest buzz is to be believed then the Vijay starrer has kept the Box Office busy not only in India but at screens across the globe." They later on agreed that the box office figures were originally 61 crore (US$11.53 million) on the opening weekend itself .[108]

117.213.52.123 (talk) 13:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the template.  A boat   that can float!   (watch me float!)  15:24, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Will you please shorten what you actually want to change here. It will be quite easy for us to understand. Thanks! -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 17:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

article has been vandalised please revert it to proper version
kollyfan has vandalised this article by removing sources,please revert it to the original proper version by YBOT or SQGibbon122.164.145.187 (talk) 14:30, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

the telugu dubbed version snehitudu is not a flop
someone has mentioned snehitudu has a failed at the boxoffice and also overall break even in the Indian boxoffice section by adding unreliable sources please remove it its spoils the look of the article here are the reliable sources such as hindu and times of india which states snehitudu is a hit http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-02-17/news-interviews/31070519_1_telugu-films-release  http://www.thehindu.com/arts/cinema/article2840296.ece122.174.47.155 (talk) 09:08, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 15 November 2012
balaji

61.16.162.210 (talk) 14:15, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Nanban Telugu version
The telugu version is reported to gross 100 cores but in telugu film industry magadheera and bussinesman is the highest grossing movie no one have ever include nanban telugu version at least as 1 of highest groosing movie.Please for the sake of we(telugu fans) pls provide actual report. I dont think so this film can gross 100 cores as even our established telugu hero(Mahesh babu,Allu arjun,Ram charan teja or Nagarjuna) hardly reach that figure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.137.64.184 (talk) 07:56, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 26 December 2012
Box office - 164 crore

Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 18:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * This figure is already cited to this source under Nanban (film). Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 18:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Controversy
Pls add info from here Kailash29792 (talk) 03:55, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Nanban boxoffice collection
nanban boxoffice collection is officially confirmed as 79 crores.refer(www.spicyonions.com) Athulnandu (talk) 08:16, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * "Spicy onions" does not sound like a reliable published mainstream source with an established reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)