Talk:Nancy Cruzan

Neutrality?
An anon editor nominated the article for review of neutrality. So, I'm here on the talk page with admittedly just a personal opinion. After carefully looking over the article, I would suggest that the article itself doesn't seem overtly biased to either side of the right-to-die debate, as it seems to represent primarily the facts of the situation (car accident, family's decision to request removal of the feeding tube, the court cases and decisions, Cruzan's death). One might argue for an inclusion of more on the controversy over "right-to-die" in this specific case. Alternately, for such discussion, it may be simpler to reference right-to-die instead on that topic. Anyway, that's my humble view, from just a plain old editor. --Umrguy42 (talk) 05:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed, and, as weeks have passed with no rationale given, I'm removing the tag. --Badger Drink (talk) 06:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)