Talk:Nancy Savoca

Propaganda?
This entire article looks like unabashed propaganda. A section about Savoca's "vision"? With undocumented and irrelevant praises like "Savoca is willing to change a line or a scene at a moment's notice if it feels right". Or how she's not like "most other directors". And the infobox listing all the awards? It doesn't seem Wikipedia standards.

And the introduction is bizarre. Why is important how her husband's name is pronounced, and how many children they have, and their gender? Kumagoro-42 19:26, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Agree; it's written too much like an essay or fan magazine.Parkwells (talk) 15:13, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm going to be working on this page, cleaning it up and putting it into proper format with references intact. I removed the "Vision" section and will rewrite that as "Themes" in encyclopedic format. Whoever wrote that section--it should be in a more neutral tone. Savoca has a number of themes running through her feature-film work, and that is an important part of her biography. I'll see what I can do with that.--Utilizer (talk) 18:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nancy Savoca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110911140915/http://tiff.net/filmsandschedules/tiff/2011/unionsquare to http://tiff.net/filmsandschedules/tiff/2011/unionsquare

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)