Talk:Nancy Temple

POV, weasel word and reference issues
There are some problems with the article as currently written. First, there are no references cited to verify any statements in the article. Second, the article had a number of "weasel words", such as talking about how "many" attorneys and accountants felt a particular way about a subject with no documentation backing up the statement. Finally, the last paragraph of the article appeared to be significantly biased, and again made statements with no direct citations.

I therefore removed the final paragraph entirely, and revised the wording on other parts of the text to remove some of the "weasel" phrases. I also tagged the article for references. Hopefully they addresses some of the POV issues I saw and will spur someone to add some citations to verify the article's statements. Dugwiki 21:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I am not a legal expert, but there are some references out there that support the last paragraph. However, I agree with you that it needs to be reworded and cited.H.al-shawaf (talk) 15:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)