Talk:Nang Lang Kham/Archive 1

Edit War
Hi, as yesterday already mentioned on your talk page reverting 3 or more times the same Edit of an Editor could be seen as Edit War, I gave you a link to what it is yesterday and today you undid the Edit again - please do not revert again or you might be reported for this, see (once again) our policies at WP:EW. CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Lol, you did the edit wars not me!!! I’m so pity you. Taung Tan (talk) 08:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, point to me which sources are unreliable? The Irrawaddy currently is in discussion for reliability. You have no rank of saying not reliable to The Irrawaddy. You are also a low-level editor like me.🤣🤣🤣 Lol Taung Tan (talk) 09:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , Adding a tag for unreliable sources without an explanation is likely to be considered disruptive. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  04:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , there is a long and detailed discussion for days ongoing for sources in several places here being used by this editor, I will restore the Tagging. The Irradaway is a source highly doubtable since it is found by Burmese exiles living in Thailand which clearly do have some political intentions in their reports, see Advocacy. CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thank you so much _/\_. The above editor putting negative tags on the articles that i created. He pretending like a smart editor, LoL low-level. I hate him very much because he bullying me on Wikipedia. You are very neutral. Yes, The Irrawaddy is currently in a discussion for reliability. If you interested, please participate at . The tag should not be restored until the discussion is over. Thanks again. Taung Tan (talk) 03:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)