Talk:Nannup, Western Australia

November 2006

 * The dot map is a placeholder - without it the distances in the infobox look bad (Nannup's unusual in requiring *five*). If you have a photograph of the town, don't hesitate to replace it :) Orderinchaos78 (t 17:50, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Lead - town vs shire
Given that the Shire of Nannup has a separate article, and this article is about the town only, I think it reasonable to separate the the mention of the shire from the lead sentence, as I did in this edit. Per MOS:FIRST: The subject of this article is the town, not the shire.
 * the first sentence should give a concise definition [of the subject]
 * Keep the first sentence focused on the subject

Also, having a lead of "Nannup is a town and shire..." would appear contrary in principle to MOS:LEAD, in particular: ... necessary to identify material that is not within scope. ... at the end of the lead to avoid cluttering and confusing the first paragraph. Mitch Ames (talk) 03:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * you need to get over it mitch - I did not see the diff re the lead sentence, and removed the edit in total rather than the rather uninformed edit about the film that utilised the streets of Nannup. JarrahTree 04:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I've re-applied my change to the lead section. I stand by my comments on your talk page. Mitch Ames (talk) 04:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)