Talk:NanoHealth

Large claims
The wording of this article could use some work. It makes some really big claims without backing them up. To fix them they need to be toned down and cited with reliable sources, or else removed. Here are the sentences in question:


 * "It became famous" -- By who's standards and where?
 * "NanoHealth has received universal acclaim and recognition" -- Universal acclaim?
 * "NanoHealth was widely covered in the Indian and international media." -- I'm not sure the scope of coverage really belongs in a subsection. It'd be better to use those news sources to cite things that have been said about NanoHealth and fit it into the rest of the article.

The rest of the article also has problems with it's tone coming off as too much like an advert. Articles should be written from a Neutral Point of View.

Opencooper (talk) 03:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)