Talk:Nanobubble

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: An interesting and well-referenced article that could well expand further.

Klbrain (talk) 07:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: This page has major problems. It cites very recent literature, including some text which is verbatim reproduced in the product literature of Moleaer. It is also incredibly selective in its coverage. Bubbles are an old topic, and have roots in work dating back at least a century, but none of this is described here. One example is the paper with ~1000 cites https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690210502, which includes some cited to Gibbs. This paper needs a major repair so it is an unbiased representation, as against the current version which is almost a product advert. No reinvention of the wheel please.

Ldm1954 (talk) 19:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)