Talk:Nanoc

I disagree on the list of features that the page currently has. I’m not going to edit the page (COI) but I’d like to give my two cents:


 * Modular architecture → Not a feature. What is a feature, is being able to write custom filters and helpers and plug them in.
 * Generation of static pages → I’d just get rid of this entirely, because that is the entire point of nanoc.
 * Security → nanoc has no security features. The security stems from the fundamental fact that no code runs on the server.
 * Versionable source files → Not really a feature either.

With those changes, the Features section would be quite empty though. Sounds like an “advantages” section would be a better fit.

Ddfreyne (talk) 10:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I see your point. So you are proposing that the section be renamed to "advantages?" Come to think of it, that would actually make a lot of sense. I'll go ahead and rename the section, thanks! It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 02:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC)