Talk:Nanooptics

Though there is also a page under nano-optics, it fits better with conventional nano terms to make it one word (nanoparticle, nanoscience, nanotechnology etc.) According to the following site, it is also more grammatically correct to do so: Grammar Book

Furthermore, that page does not include much of the scientific background behind the phenomena. This page is a start in that direction, though specific applications need to be added Celticlaire 22:24, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * No worries, that isn't a deletion tag. It's just a tag for whoever wants to add the references to it. -FisherQueen (Talk) 22:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I disagree. Novotny titles his book Nano-Optics and the oo sound is not pronounced. Say the oo like it should be pronounced like in google, or kangaroo. Then say nanooptics the same way. It doesn't make sense. They are two separate words. The tile of this topic should be nano-optics. Gfutia 07:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


 * This is a good entry but a bit rambling. If you have the time it would be great to make sections and an index for easier reading. I also wholeheartedly agree that it should be written "nano-optics" and you should consolidate with that article. Sorry but conventions supersede rules. 168.122.159.98 06:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)