Talk:Nape piercing

Previous versions of this page report a high rejection rate, while the 11 December 2006 edit changes this to a low rejection rate. Anyone have actual numbers for this, or a credible source to sight?
 * The APP did a study on rejection of surface piercings - I'll dig it up and cite it. Might take a day or so, though. Glowimperial 00:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The study was published in issue #33 Fall 2005 of The Point, the APP's journal. It shows over a period of three years, of a total 233 people that had the piercing done, 9 had to have the the bar removed. None of these removals were for migration, but tearing and non-health related reasons. With a successful healing rate of about 97% I'd say that warrants the low rate description. Graphia 04:28, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I just found the study (forgot I was supposed to be looking for it!) and I agree. Properly pierced napes have some of the highest success rates of all surface piercings.  I'll cite it in the article. Glowimperial 05:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nape piercing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060518140536/http://www.safepiercing.org/PDFs/Point33.pdf to http://www.safepiercing.org/PDFs/Point33.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:03, 12 February 2018 (UTC)