Talk:Naqa

Seeming contradiction in the article...
In the article, it says that the site dates back to the 4th century BCE, but later in the article it states that temple "500", built by Shanakdakhete/o in 135 BCE, is the oldest building on the site. 135 BCE is in the 2nd century BCE. Am I missing something or not considering something that I should? - A.Tamar Chabadi (talk) 16:11, 23 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The excavators argue that the site must date back to at least the late 3rd century because the Meroitic name of Naqa is recorded in an inscription in Musawwarat, cf. site guide, p. 39. They further assume, that before a temple is built there should be left time for a city ti develop. Tobias Paul (talk) 19:31, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Some modifications in "Research"
Since 2013 the excavation changed from Egyptian Museum Berlin to the Egyptian Museum in Munich. Main archaeologists are now Dietrich Wildung and Carla Kroeper. As a consequence of this also the statue of Isis (pictured in the article) is now on display (as a long term loan from Sudan) at the Museum in Munich. Lech Krzyżaniak, mentionned as member of the excavation team, died on 10th july 2004 (see: http://www.muzarp.poznan.pl/en/museum/prof-lech-krzyzaniak-en/) -- JoWi -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.150.34.171 (talk) 09:43, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Supplement: The link for the changed responsability of the actual excavation from Berlin to Munich (unfortunately only in German language) is: http://www.smaek.de/inhalt/presse/docs/2014_sand_in_my_eyes/projekt_naga.pdf -- JoWi -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.150.34.171 (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 05:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)