Talk:Naraka (Hinduism)

Original research in the 'narrative, social and economic section'
Original research is warranted. The prose also is not encylopaedic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordtalbut (talk • contribs) 18:03, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

added narrative, social and economic section. --Allenpercussion (talk) 11:44, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

The narrative, social, and economic section seems highly interpretive without adequate citations. The whole section adds little to understanding hell. A big chunk rather it is an interpretation of a scene from the MBh that is entirely subjective. The voice also reads like spiritual advice more than an encyclopedia. Should all be removed.Iṣṭa Devatā (talk) 15:19, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naraka (Hinduism). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121113025849/http://vedabase.net/sb/5/26/en2 to http://vedabase.net/sb/5/26/en2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)