Talk:Nassak Diamond/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * (1A) The "Nassak Diamond was stolen from the Shiva statue" sentence was removed since the reference did not support it. (1B) The red links were removed and the extra links of "tax" were removed. (2A) Reference 11 and 21 uses template:cite book and reference 23 uses template:cite journal. These two templates default to the italicized titles seen in 11, 21, and 23. -- Suntag  ☼  22:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you to Suntag for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) Also, I would suggest to respond to the POV issues that a user has left. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Snags
Since this article appeared on the main page, some POV has been pushed into it. Also, rather a lot of the in line citations seem just to refer to old versions of the article itself. The term "CCPA" appears, but links just to the same article. Man with two legs (talk) 11:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The POV was not supported by the references and was removed. The in line citations referring to old versions of the article itself appear to have been removed. The CCPA notes specify the same source, but different pages on the source. I fixed the page numbering per Shortened footnotes. -- Suntag  ☼  22:41, 21 November 2008 (UTC)