Talk:Nasutoceratops

Skull length
Page 2 of the Sampson et al (2013) article, in the "Material" section, notes that the holotype skull is 1.8 m long. Our Wikipedia article notes 1.5 m long. Also the lead paragraph notes that the late Campanian is "about 75.97-75.51 Ma" while the Temporal range section of the taxobox notes "75.9–75.2 Ma". I am not sure which is accurate, but I'm sure you would agree that we should pick one. Thank you, in advance, for your consideration. Evangelos Giakoumatos (talk) 00:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I spoke too soon. The Sampson et al. (2013) article agrees with the lead paragraph information.  I will make changes to the Automatic taxobox.   Evangelos Giakoumatos (talk) 00:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Phylogeny
Thinking of replacing the existing cladogram with the one from Ryan et al. (2016). The topology is more or less the same, but this new one has more detail and also names the Nasutoceratopsini and Centrosaurini. Or should both be kept? Lythronaxargestes (talk) 23:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If one just has more detail/more taxa, the old one is redundant. In something like Deltadromeus, where the topographies are wildly different, I can see why two would be included, though. FunkMonk (talk) 08:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nasutoceratops. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402103645/http://content.lib.utah.edu:81/cgi-bin/showfile.exe?CISOROOT=%2Fetd3&client_addr=5.103.58.97&CISOPTR=528&filename= to http://content.lib.utah.edu:81/cgi-bin/showfile.exe?CISOROOT=%2Fetd3&client_addr=5.103.58.97&CISOPTR=528&filename=
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130828042919/http://www.geology.utah.gov/online/c/c-93/gseprocl.htm to http://geology.utah.gov/online/c/c-93/gseprocl.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Unchanged
, you will see there is no difference in the arrangement of Nasutoceratopsini, which is most immediate relationships. Similar reasoning was used by other editors for Achelousaurus and Pachyrhinosaurus articles. 2001:569:7821:500:A47E:5CD:254B:F95 (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

See, the user IJReid agrees with me. 2001:569:7821:500:A47E:5CD:254B:F95 (talk) 21:21, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * OK Jim1138 (talk) 01:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC)