Talk:Natacha Merritt

Notability
Having had a book published is not enough for notability. Rhomb (talk) 11:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Multiple Issues tag added. Comment
First up, the subject does seem to me to meet notability criteria. Perhaps only just, but enough; so I'm not advocating deletion.

Parts of the article read like a promo for the subject. I note that one of the editors in article History used the subject's name in creating the user account. Make of that what you will. Significant re-wording for WP:NPoV would be good.

Some of the references are fine, others look like rubbish to me. Point is, there's not enough good ones.

I'll try to get back later and do some copy-editing. Wayne 12:48, 19 October 2016 (UTC)


 * This does not seem to meet criteria for notability, and tone is entirely promo. Also, not only did one of the editors use subject’s name, another used subject’s partner’s name. 2603:8000:1400:5BF3:5FE:F68D:D389:4A25 (talk) 00:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Natacha Merritt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120111220007/http://www.bongout.org/ to http://www.bongout.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)