Talk:Natal red rock hare/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 04:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

GA criteria
: With a few minor grammatical tweaks, the article complies with MOS policies on grammar, as well as layout and formatting. While you&#39;re doing that... (talk) 12:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article uses a handful of references, all of which are reputable and third-party in origin. It appears to make thorough use of each of them, and there are no signs of original research. While you&#39;re doing that... (talk) 12:27, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: It looks as though the article covers all the basic areas of its subject that would be expected of an encyclopedic entry. Adequate coverage, and lack of trivial content. While you&#39;re doing that... (talk) 12:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article discusses its topic in a completely unbiased manner. While you&#39;re doing that... (talk) 12:24, 11 October 2017 (UTC) . Looking back as far as January 2014, the article has not suffered from edit warring or any other disruptive behaviour from its contributors in that time. While you&#39;re doing that... (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC) : Both images used in the article serve relevant illustrative purposes; one to depict the appearance of the topic species, and the other to provide a visual aide to the species' habitat range. While you&#39;re doing that... (talk) 05:22, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

The article meets the GA criteria, and passes the test. Congratulations! While you&#39;re doing that... (talk) 12:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks a ton, Wilhelmina Will, for reviewing it! Adityavagarwal (talk) 13:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)