Talk:Natalia Brasova

Neutrality of Exile section
[Pasted from User talk:DrKiernan 17:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)]

Hi, I see you reverted my removal of controversial statements on Natalia Brasova, the text I removed was POV that should be fought in Line of succession to the Russian throne and not on every possible page that mentions a Russian pretender. Pevernagie (talk) 22:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The material I inserted was cited, relevant and accurate. DrKiernan (talk) 08:16, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It's POV, I am not claiming that you are not using sources to back up your POV-version of the facts. Pevernagie (talk) 08:40, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you actually know what a weasel word is? Look it up. Pevernagie (talk) 09:49, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't understand your problem with the article. It looks fine to me. DrKiernan (talk) 09:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * you are summing up arguments why Grand Duke Cyril should not be considered the legit pretender of his time, that's a discussion you should have on Line of succession to the Russian throne and not on articles related to the Russian dynasty that do not deal with the disputed headship. There is no problem mentioning that he was just one of the pretenders (although the others never publicly outed themselves as such), and that his position as head was not universally accepted, but you are practically holding his trial here. Pevernagie (talk) 19:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we need a third opinion. We could ask for feedback at Third opinion or Neutral point of view/Noticeboard. DrKiernan (talk) 20:24, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That might be the solution, do you file it? Pevernagie (talk) 21:30, 15 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your opinion.Pevernagie (talk) 18:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC)