Talk:Natalia Kucirkova

Needs more reliable sources
It seems a lot of the sources used on this article are not reliable sources (by Wikipedia standards). I recommend reading the WP:RELIABLE guideline, specifically the section WP:REPUTABLE. It says that articles should be primarily based on "independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." "Independent" means that the majority of sources used should not be connected to the subject being discussed, and "reputation for fact-checking" usually means the source should be known to have some sort of editing or fact-checking process.

At the moment, none of the current sources used are WP:INDEPENDENT - The first five sources are places she has worked (not independent), and the last two seem to be self-published, primary sources. The article should at least have one independent, secondary source. For now, I'll tag the article accordingly. - Whisperjanes (talk) 20:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)