Talk:Natalie (website)

Importance scale
From what I gather the importance scales are suppose to be set at "low" and then it is up to the project to change them accordingly. A bot will notify the projects that this article has been added, and that they need to review the importance scale. Alternatively, you could add and a bot will work out the scales for the project. Which method should be implemented in this case? Wesley ☀  Mouse  19:48, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * A list of what the importance scales mean can be found at Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Release Version Criteria. From what that link reads, members of a project or external interests can scale the level of importance.  Based on the article being of a specialised subject, its level would be low for WP:Media and WP:Journalism - as the guidance reads LOW = subject is mainly of specialist interest.  I have left a copy of this conversation on the article's talk page.   Wesley  ☀  Mouse  20:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Natalie (website). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101216071419/http://business.nifty.com/articles/inside/101213/index.htm to http://business.nifty.com/articles/inside/101213/index.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070305033010/http://www.venturenow.jp/news/2007/02/01/1740_014091.html to http://www.venturenow.jp/news/2007/02/01/1740_014091.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)