Talk:Natalie Di Luccio

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted because: The reason for speedy deletion covers ".....pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion....." --Ruzbehraja (talk) 18:22, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * This page is not exclusively promotional.
 * It is based on a neutral point of view.
 * It is based on external verifiable and reputable links.
 * The fundamentals of this article are based on similar other articles as mentioned below.
 * Several similar pages with similar structure and content have been allowed. Eg: Amy_Walker, Ana_Gomes_Ferreira, Christina_Grimmie
 * This article may need more information rather than being speedy deleted.

Removal of "lacks citation" tag
The page seems to have sufficient (12) references and most points have inline references. They are news references too, considered as valid references for Wikipedia. Kindly clarify why the tag for citation requirement is used on the page or please consider removing it. Abhinavdhere (talk) 05:58, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

✅ In reference to my post @05:58, 16 March 2012 (UTC), no subsequent reply, and visibly sufficient references, I have removed the { {BLP sources} } template. Abhinavdhere (talk) 03:29, 3 April 2012 (UTC)