Talk:Natasha Blakeman

Untitled
This Article should be removed and Natasha Blakeman should be movd to the minor characters 2008 Article,we simply do not know enough about this character and she is rarely used on coronation street i would consider her a recurring character or even a minor character she has only appeared in a small amount episodes and she hasnt been onscreen for months now,would anyone agree with me?!! Brianwazere (talk) 22:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Well we could say the same about Kelly Crabtree. However, she has had a storyline of her own (her romance with Tony) which makes her more than a recurring character. Just leave it as it is :) Alex250P (talk) 16:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)


 * She has had her own storylines but the fact is that it not a stub, there are reliable references on that article, it's not a poorly written article, it's got creation and development with cited sources... Raintheone (talk) 16:46, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

ya but when has she last appeared it was months ago i would consider her a recurring characterbrian moore (talk) 18:39, 15 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I think you might be forgetting this is wikipedia and not a website to store fictional character biographies depending on their status... Would you remove Dot Cotton hasn't been in Eastender's for a while, is she a recurring character?Raintheone (talk) 23:20, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

well Dot Cotton is differant her character is gone to scotland till next year all im saying is Natasha rarely appears she isnt an established character brian moore (talk) 23:28, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Tut, tut. Doubt you will get any where with a deletion log if you talk to people like that.Raintheone (talk) 01:33, 16 November 2009 (UTC)