Talk:Natasha Henstridge

You Gotta Be Kidding
Whoever wrote this can't complete a grammatically correct sentence. Major rewrite.

photos
I enjoy her naked as much as the next man, but this is hardly the place to be trading vidcaps. - Tarquin Sidebottom

dont make any changes in my page
dont delete or make any change to my page ...if u have a problem with the images ,,better not watch it ....i found more objectionable images than mine in several articles.. IF U HAVE A PROBLEM WITH MY IMAGES ,JUST IGNORE THEM....AJEET ROBINS


 * Ajeet, you don't own this page. You do own your contributions to the page, but the page is owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, and you have granted a general license for your content to be used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows others, including other Wikipedia editors, to use and modify the content in any way they choose, as long at their changes are also under the GFDL.  Please see Ownership of articles for more information on this subject. Gentgeen 16:44, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * That is true. Whenever you're editing an article, check the bottom of the page, last sentence in bold.  I quote: If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, do not submit it. .  And further about the images: I see you have not provided a status description for them.  If the images are under copyrights and we do not have the owner's permission to use them, they cannot be in the article, and will probably be deleted from our servers.  For more on this, please see Copyrights,  Copyright FAQ and Deletion policy.  Thanks,  Redux 00:39, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

Plot summaries
I am not at all convinced that we should have the plot summaries on this page. They are more suited to wikipedia articles on the movies themselves rather than on this article about Henstridge. Comments? --Yamla 22:57, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * You are right. We could have small descriptions of Henstridge's role in each movie, but that would be best if really limited, with a wikilink to the appropriate article.  Regards, Redux 04:01, 16 August 2005 (UTC)


 * I agree. The level of description for Species is OK, but Species II is far more than we need here.  If kept as is, it needs a spoiler tag, which I will add in the interim. Sunray 23:38, August 23, 2005 (UTC)


 * I've trimmed everything after the spoiler warning and moved it all to the Species II article - that was a stub anyway, so it makes sense for the text to go there. Bob the Pirate 11:51, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

message
PLEASE DONT TAMPER WITH MY ARTICLE ....its my article ... ......if u dont like my article PLEASE DONT READ IT .........what is so difficult to understand ? AJEET ROBINS


 * Ajeet, it isn't your article. See above for a complete explanation why you have already agreed this is the case.  --Yamla 15:11, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Before anything else: if you have an account, why are you posting here under an IP address? There are changes in the article made by Ajeet robins, but all comments on this talk page made on behalf of that account have been made under an IP address.  Please, don't do that.  Log in, and sign your comments with tildes ( ~ ), this way, we can account for your contributions and credit you for them.  On the issue itself: this is been already explained above quite clearly.  Please, read those posts, and the pages linked in them.  If you feel you cannot agree to that, you have two options: don't submit material to Wikipedia or you can use your user page to speak Henstridge's glory, but note WP:NOT: a user page is not a personal website.  As far as this article is concerned, however, sorry but you do not own it.  Regards, Redux 18:42, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

Picture Title
"the quintessential sci-fi actress"? Why? Fang Aili 19:18, 22 August 2005 (UTC) It must be the chest. Resonanteye

Power and Beauty (2002)?
The article on Judith Campbell Exner claims that Natasha Henstridge played Exner in a 2002 film title Power and Beauty (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Exner#In_popular_culture). That film is not mentioned in the article on Henstridge. Why? Rammer (talk) 06:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Natasha Henstridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071105192656/http://www.ea.com:80/article.jsp?id=cnccast1030 to http://www.ea.com/article.jsp?id=cnccast1030

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 22:43, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Natasha Henstridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070908184311/http://www.newfoundlandersabroad.com/profiles.asp?profile=nhenstridge to http://www.newfoundlandersabroad.com/profiles.asp?profile=nhenstridge
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070208232047/http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/show/CTVShows/20060919/ctv_release_20060919_kings/20060919 to http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/show/CTVShows/20060919/ctv_release_20060919_kings/20060919

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Removing HIV Reference
The claim in the intro paragraph that she has HIV is unsourced, and I can't find any evidence to support it in an admittedly quick search. Given that 2017 is also the year she accused Brett Ratner of sexual assault and the prevalence of trolls re: anyone associated with Me Too, I'm removing the line.

73.145.230.216 (talk) 02:00, 7 May 2020 (UTC)