Talk:Natasha St-Pier (album)

Cutting out conversational waffle. Restructure to leave apparent 'facts'
This mini-article, no better than a stub, was riddled with conversational blather and uncited claims. I have removed the inconsequential, leaving what might be fact, with requests for citations.

Intro statement: the word "Only", removed - an implied subjective view; the Wiki link over "1,2,3" led to other examples, not to this one - unnecessary.

Section "Production" unnecesary: covered by sub-header "Background". Section now headed "Background".

Previous "Background" sub section: riddled with vague conversation-speak, reading like a fan forum or a promotional web site, such as "The singer wanted this to be a more personal album than her previous offerings and she opened herself up to fans to some extent, giving glimpses into her... ". No need to refer to the artist by first name after the intro statement, or at all. I have focussed the remaining paltry information on the subject of the article - the album, not the artist. As it stood, the article violated No original research and probably Conflict of interest.

References: as there aren't any, section removed.

Acabashi (talk) 21:44, 16 August 2010 (UTC)