Talk:Nation.1

This article has a reliable source: Wired Magazine and should not be deleted. Although the organization no longer exists, its three year history is of interest to a wider audience and the article should be allowed to be written. --Iwoj (talk) 05:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I think that the organization is notable in how it relates to the topics of the governance of cyberspace and youth activism. It is in many ways a continuation of the ideas laid out in A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. --Iwoj (talk) 06:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm having trouble getting over the fact that, as far as I can tell, Nation.1 is NOT a country. It doesn't fit the definition of country. It has no recognition as a country by any significant political body. Whilst it may well exist (or have existed) as a youth movement which models itself on a country, this is not the same as being a country. (After all, if all it took was a press release to form a country, there presumably would be a lot more people doing it.) Surely, the article should recognise this, rather than falling into line with Nation.1s media briefings? 91.84.38.65 (talk) 11:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

By all means, add some of this commentary. It was an attempt at creating a country that ostensibly failed. But it is still worth noting the project, particularly in the light of the notion of micronations. --Iwoj (talk) 23:41, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Use of the template
The template on the right seems to me quite facetious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.130.74.60 (talk) 10:10, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Disagree. It's literal and objective, reflecting the intent. David Spector (talk) 14:06, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

What happened to it?
The article talks about how it started; but never mentions how it ended, or what is it's current conditions. --TiagoTiago (talk) 08:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)