Talk:Nation and Freedom Committee

Excessive inline citations
[...] KNS in connection with the pressure exerted by the security forces.[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]

19 (!) references for such a short paragraph seems to be a bit of an overkill on the citation part. Maybe just pick 1-2 reliable, quality sources and an official, primary state source + internet-archive links. That should be enough. No need to add so many sources that likely don't differ in their contents. --- Nakonana (talk) 20:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)


 * More such cases:
 * "KNS is the core of the right wing of the Russian protest movement, in connection with which the organization's associates are regularly arrested during protests,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]"
 * "for publishing music on Vkontakte, despite the fact that the post was made 5 years ago, when Vladimir was still in school.[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79]"
 * And the external links section also appears to be a bit excessive. Nakonana (talk) 20:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

CND? KNU?
Both abbreviations appear twice in the article, but aren't explained anywhere. Are those typos? Should it be "KNS" instead? Nakonana (talk) 20:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC)