Talk:National Assembly Building of Slovenia/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 09:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Will review. Sainsf &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 09:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Lead

 * I would recommend keeping only one pronunciation in the lead so that it looks a bit less clumsy (see WP:MOSLEAD); the pronunciations can be stated in the infobox.


 * We do not keep citations in the lead unless we make significant claims. Not a strict rule, just felt I should mention it.
 * Cite number 1 (visitor numbers) has no other place in the text or infobox which it can be placed, cite number 2 now moved further down


 *  (Skupščina Republike Slovenije, It was opened Something wrong with the bracket?


 * People's Assembly Building of the Republic of Slovenia and Palace of the People's Assembly need not be in bold.
 * I think they do, as previous names for the place.


 * You should add the Parliament (Parlament) as an a.k.a. name in the first line.

Construction

 * of 394 feet (120 m)  What is this? The height? The base diameter?
 * clarified height


 * A new legislature building was thereafter...bronze figures framing its main portico. Source?


 * Twenty-seven master craftsmen As per WP:MOSNUM you should say "27", it would also appear less wordy.


 * It was completed in 1959. Source?


 *  At the 1991 independence of Slovenia Better say "After the independence of Slovenia in 1991".
 * changed to "following"

Design

 * the main façade faces Republic Square and is inlaid with Karst marble, with green Oplotnica granite below each window.  Does ref. 6 support this as well?
 * That's supported by refs 6/3/7


 * wall painting by the 20th century mural artist Slavko Pengov, extends across the length of the entrance hall and illustrates the history of Slovenians Does ref. 4 support this as well?
 * It can, but ref 8 is there to do that


 * the mural portrays events including You give the years for some events and not for others. Would be good to have consistency.
 * The events which took place within a year have theirs. The world wars don't need to have years on and the last two items are connected to WWII.


 * Following the 1991 independence of Slovenia No need to mention the year again, we know this already.
 * What's the harm?
 * Not adamant on this, just a suggestion of mine. Fine, keep it as you like. Sainsf  &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 06:37, 8 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Link or explain amphitheater


 * Duplicate links: independence of Slovenia, Slovenian Parliament

Incidents

 * Link granite, euro.

That should be it. These done, I would be glad to promote this. Cheers! Sainsf &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 06:34, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Changes made as ticked above.  Rcsprinter123    (interface)  19:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the quick replies. I believe the article is ready for promotion now. Great job! Sainsf  &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 06:39, 8 April 2016 (UTC)