Talk:National Center for Foreign Commerce

note
PLANILLA "SOLICITUD DE AUTORIZACIÓN DE ADQUISICIÓN DE DIVISAS DESTINADAS AL PAGO DE ACTIVIDADES ACADÉMICAS EN EL EXTERIOR" (FORMACADIVI-001) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.242.76.148 (talk) 11:49, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

CADIVI
I think you are POV when only show old information, like the reason about what CADIVI exists back in 2003, and with the only source of the government, why you keep editing reliable source updated information, people has the right to know more about specific details about this regulation, is like trying to explain the Britain Elections with only one paragraph give me a break, if we are neutral we have to show both sides, not only the official story, remember Wikipedia does not have strict rules. BCLH (talk) 14:43, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I've said why I removed those details - Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. CADIVI says why it was created. If you have some proper sources about the economic impact of exchange controls, that might be relevant. Opinion (sourced or otherwise) plus details of how to exchange currency are not encyclopedic. Believe it or not, I've been a Wikipedia editor a long time, and I know what I'm doing, which is writing an encyclopedia. Rd232 talk 15:42, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * For example, the CADIVI article needs to be about CADIVI - and not about Venezuelan exchange controls. Decisions made about those controls, and their effects, may well belong elsewhere. CADIVI is just an agency, and discussion should take into account the extent to which it makes the relevant decisions, or just does admin. (This is one area to clarify: to what extent does CADIVI have decision power in allocating foreign exchange? How much freedom does it have as an agency? etc.) Rd232 talk 15:47, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * PS this sort of discussion should really be at Talk:CADIVI to make it more likely others can get involved. Rd232 talk 15:49, 7 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok so we can create an article about efects of the currency control in Venezuela?. Does that fits in Wikipedia? BCLH (talk) 16:12, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * In principle, I guess (depends on the exact title). I can't find any comparable articles on that kind of topic for other countries though, and Foreign exchange controls itself has hardly any content. It would probably be better to start off with a section in Economy of Venezuela (although that article needs lots of work generally, adding a section won't hurt, it's a mess anyway). It can then spin off into its own article if the content justifies it. Which is the key point: it needs to have good sources providing economic analysis, not anecdotes or mere listing of the details of the controls. Rd232 talk 19:34, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

To date my contribution is minor (clarifying the "legal" status of the exchange mechanism etc. Before making either of two pending changes I wanted to highlight them here: A) The link to CADAVI ("CADIVI, una medidia necesaria") appears to be a broken link. Furthermore, by its very title one can see its lack of neutral POV, requiring that it be cited as an "official explanation." B) The structure and placement of the reference to the 2003 strike appears to me to be adding an opinion, again non-neutral POV. I suggest that if it is desired to retain that reference in the article. that it at least be made independent from the simple sentence which has the dates and fully objective information.  Opinions? GrinchPeru (talk) 23:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Center for Foreign Commerce. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081205143924/http://www.cadivi.gov.ve/cadivi/cadivi.html to http://www.cadivi.gov.ve/cadivi/cadivi.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)